Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So. 2d 163.

600 citing documents.

Johnson v. Beavers 496 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Goldstein v. Serio 496 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1980), writ granted, judgment affirmed, (1982); , (1969) (overruled on other matter, ).
Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 507 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hebert v. First Guar. Bank 493 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Marler v. Rent-It Co. 490 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[we can] give no weight to the judgment of the trial court which implemented the jury verdict.”
Concordia Parish School Bd. v. Russ 491 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Dreher v. Hood Motor Co., Inc. 492 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Efferson v. State, Through Dept. of T. & Dev., (La.App.
Matter of Succession of Stevenson 492 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Eldridge v. Downtowner Hotel 492 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Schouest v. Stipelcovich 490 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Daigle v. Coastal Marine, Inc. 488 So. 2d 679 La. 1986
Parrino v. Royal Ins. Co. of America 484 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Picou v. Ferrara 483 So. 2d 915 La. 1986
Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc. 481 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Lee v. Cook 482 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Lee v. K-Mart Corp. 483 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Freeman v. Varnado 480 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Collins v. Christophe 479 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Varnado v. Sanders 477 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Veazey v. Parish of Avoyelles 476 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways, supra; Hayes v. State, Through Dept. of Transportation, supra; see also: (La.
Hardy v. Whitney 480 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
art. 2164 authorizes an appellate court to render any judgment which is just, legal and proper on the record, mandates this court when a complete record is before it to evaluate the evidence and decide the case in accordance with the evidence.
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
Hasapis v. Centanni 476 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
We find, however, after a that the evidence in defendants’ favor was overwhelming and that an adjudication against Hasapis’ interests was and is correct.
Rodriguez v. Traylor 479 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1983) at footnote 3 should be reviewed and/or explained so as to give a litigant the benefit of the entire judicial process.
Liles v. Brown 471 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Although the excluded testimony is included in the record as a proffer of proof, and under *1081 we would have the right to decide the case, we decline to do so.
Fontenot v. Hanover Ins. Co. 473 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
See, -65 (La.1975); Reed v. Gulf Ins.
Dawson v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. 475 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
This is not to say, and Gonzales [ ] should not be read to require, that the appellate court must find its own facts in every such case.
Bessie v. K-Mart Apparel Fashions Corp. 472 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Since the only issue of the new trial would have been quantum
Lanclos v. Rockwell Intern. Corp. 470 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Mitchell v. Windham 469 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
We will not remand the rest of the case, because we have strong doubts as to whether plaintiff can prevail in his claim based on a wrongful arrest, and in the interest of avoiding a third trial on the remaining issues, including quantum, we shall decide them here
Reed v. House of Decor, Inc. 468 So. 2d 1159 La. 1985
This court, summarily remanded and ordered the intermediate court to decide the case on the complete record.
Turner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 472 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
This is not to say, and Gonzales [ ] should not be read to require, that the appellate court must find its own facts in every such case.
Arcemont v. Voisin 468 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Rose v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir. 1977), writs denied, , 162 (La.1977)
Giles Lafayette, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 467 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hayes v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT 467 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 466 So. 2d 1280 La. 1985
Lulich v. Robin 466 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
McQuarters v. Zegar 466 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Arnold v. TG & Y. STORES CO. 466 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Quinn v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 464 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Lauga v. McDougall 463 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Gennardo 464 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
since we have the entire record, we must determine the damages which plaintiff suffered as a result of this accident.
Bishop v. Shelter Ins. Co. 461 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Walker v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF HIGHWAYS 460 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Efferson v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 463 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Succession of Remont 462 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Duvio v. Continental Casualty Co. 458 So. 2d 931 La. 1984
Prejean v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 457 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984