Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Jones-Journet, 320 So. 2d 533.

75 citing documents.

Fanguy v. Pumilia 498 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Schiro v. Travelers Ins. Co. 489 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Mitchell v. Crane 485 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Gavin v. Superior Applicators, Inc. 484 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
where several parties signed a note containing the words " We promise to pay" their liability was held to be joint not solidary.
Hardy v. Whitney 480 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Beauchamp 473 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the jurisprudence set forth two criteria to determine whether a judgment had, in fact, been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices: (1) that the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered showed the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant seeking re
Goodson v. Sills 470 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Smith v. Lee 444 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The court also cited Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., as cases leading to the formulation of the criteria.
Bush v. Lee 443 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Succession of Lewis 440 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
The criteria set forth for annulling a : [H]owever; the jurisprudence set forth two criteria to determine whether a judgment had, in fact, been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices: (1) the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered showed the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant seeking relief, and (2) the enforcement of
Wood v. Wood 440 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Our state supreme court, construing La.C.C.P.
Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield 434 So. 2d 1067 La. 1983
Stewart v. Goeb 432 So. 2d 246 La. 1983
Gramm v. Brock 430 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
No definition of the term "ill practices" is given in the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, but the Louisiana Supreme Court, enunciated the two criteria set forth in our jurisprudence to determine whether a judgment had been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices.
Brown v. Brown 430 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. Crawford 426 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
The note sued upon reads as follows: *1351 the court stated: It is well settled that absent additional promissory language, the words "[we] promise to pay" in a note signed by co-makers are insufficient to constitute the express stipulation of liability in solido required by law.
Zeigler v. Zeigler 420 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Gladstone v. American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. 419 So. 2d 1219 La. 1982
this court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Daigle v. Chaisson 396 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Parrino v. Parrino 393 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Articles 2082, 2088, Civil Code
DOZIER, ETC. v. Burleigh 380 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
TPMPT Emp. Credit Union v. Charpentier 376 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
*596 the Supreme Court quoting Civil Code Article 2082 stated: ".
Hillary v. Gastel Corp. 358 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Art. 2004, at 537: “Article 2004 is drawn primarily from Article 607 of the Code of Practice, which, in addition to announcing the general rule that judgments obtained by fraud or ill practices were subject to annulment, set forth as illustrations bribery of the judge or witnesses, production of forged documents, and p
Hartley v. Hartley 341 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
In support of his first specification of error
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Soileau 323 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(S.Ct.La.1975); Shreveport Bank & LSA-R.S.