Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Chicago Insurance Company, 320 So. 2d 134.

59 citing documents.

Land v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. 212 So. 3d 1166 La. 2017
Joseph Babineaux v. University Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Babineaux v. University Medical Center 177 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Re: Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust and Eleanor Pierce Stevens Revocable Gift Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust 159 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., ), There has been no showing of irreparable injury in this case.
Habitat, Inc. v. Commons Condominiums, LLC 97 So. 3d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Buckheister v. United States Environmental Services, L.L.C. 97 So. 3d 414 La. 2012
Cece Sloan v. Renee Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir.), judgment affirmed, (affirmed additur of $20,000.00 to a $21,000.00-award for multiple physical injuries where there was a twenty percent disability, and the 9 range of general damage awards for similar injuries was $35,000.00 to $100,000.00); Greer v. State Ex.
Sloan v. Mouton 82 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir.), judgment affirmed, (affirmed additur of $20,000.00 to a $21,000.00-award for multiple physical injuries where there was a twenty percent disability, and the | ¶ nrange of general damage awards for similar injuries was $35,000.00 to $100,000.00); Greer v. State ex rel.
Alvarez v. LeBlanc 996 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Guidry v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. 822 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
the supreme court addressed the issue of consent with regard to a request for an additur or remittitur, stating: The Louisiana statutory scheme requires the consent of the party adversely affected by an additur or remittitur.
Explained VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 801 So. 2d 331 La. 2001
Co., Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., 203 La.
Accardo v. Cenac 722 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Decker v. Kibler 731 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co. Maxie v. Gines, 95-986 (La.App.
Merritt v. Dixon 695 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Cormier v. McDonough 682 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Wooley v. EJD Builders, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Bailey v. Robert v. Neuhoff Ltd. Partnership 665 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Morgan v. Belanger 633 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lougon v. Era Aviation, Inc. 609 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., the defendant admitted liability, and the issue of quantum was tried before a jury.
Chandler v. Grass 600 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Petitto v. McMichael 588 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Young v. Colligan 560 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Combs v. Hartford Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Directional Wireline Services, Inc. v. Tillett 540 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Richard v. Domingue 542 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Franklin v. Paul Dupuis & Associates 543 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Core v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Reynolds v. Singleton 540 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Atkins v. Johnson 535 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Cosie v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Ins. Co. 527 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hardin v. Munchies Food Store 521 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Laughlin v. Breaux 515 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Karl v. Amoco Production Co. 507 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Co., that a party who acquiesced in an additur or remittitur as an alternative to new trial could not raise the issue of quantum on appeal except by way of answer if the opposing party appealed the amount of the award.
Williams v. Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers, Inc. 503 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
4 Cir.1972); Miller v. Chicago Insurance Co.
Bazare v. Transit Casualty Co. 494 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Co., which held that a plaintiff accepting a remittitur has no right to appeal unless the defendant appeals.
Mediamolle v. K-Mart Discount Stores 494 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Co., Core v. Winn-Dixie of La., Inc., , 242 n. 3 (La.App.
Karl v. Amoco Production Co. 492 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Palermo v. Lusignan 482 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
If a remittitur or additur is entered, then the court shall reform the jury verdict or judgment in accordance therewith.” the Louisiana Supreme Court, in interpreting the provisions of then La.C.C.P.
Core v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 471 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Cariere v. State Farm Ins. Co. 467 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2d Cir.1976); Watson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Elliott v. Merritt 457 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Ellis v. Allstate Ins. Co. 453 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted this language to mean"additur and remittitur are available if the issue of quantum is clearly and *1215 fairly separable from other issues in the case."
Conner v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. 446 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 432 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Ritter v. Willis 425 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In re the Succession of Washington 380 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Weber v. Bon Marche Pharmacy, Inc. 378 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Finally, we have considered whether the judgment would be supported by Art. 1813's provisions for remittitur, indicates otherwise.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by