State of Louisiana v. John D. LaFleur
State of Louisiana v. John D. LaFleur, No. 56,579-KA On Rehearing (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. Jan. 14, 2026).
Opinion text
Judgment rendered January 14, 2026.
No. 56,579-KA
ON REHEARING
COURT OF APPEAL
SECOND CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA
*****
STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee
versus
JOHN D. LaFLEUR Appellant
*****
Per Curiam on Rehearing
Originally appealed from the
First Judicial District Court for the
Parish of Caddo, Louisiana
Trial Court No. 397,839
Honorable Donald E. Hathaway, Jr., Judge
*****
LOUISIANA APPEALS & WRIT SERVICE Counsel for
By: Holli Herrle-Castillo Appellant
JAMES E. STEWART, SR. Counsel for
District Attorney Appellee
ASHLIN N. THOMAS
ERIC M. WHITEHEAD
Assistant District Attorneys
*****
Before STONE, STEPHENS, ROBINSON, MARCOTTE,
and ELLENDER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Despite the silence of one penalty provision, R.S. 14:35.3 (L),
with respect to the denial of benefits, another subsection, 14:35.3 (C),
required the district court to impose “at least forty-eight hours of the
sentence” without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of
sentence. State v. Caldwell, 56,269 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/21/25), 411 So.
3d 934; State v. Williams, 56,351 (La. App. 2 Cir. 7/16/25), 416 So.
3d 943. On rehearing, we find the district court’s imposition of one
year without benefits satisfied both portions of the statute. The
original sentence is affirmed in its entirety.