State of Louisiana v. Charles Ray Lampley
State of Louisiana v. Charles Ray Lampley, No. 56,296-KA (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. Mar. 26, 2025).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Whitaker 225 So. 3d 524
Opinion text
Judgment rendered March 26, 2025.
No. 56,296-KA
COURT OF APPEAL
SECOND CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA
*****
STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee
versus
CHARLES RAY LAMPLEY Appellant
*****
Appealed from the
Fourth Judicial District Court for the
Parish of Ouachita, Louisiana
Trial Court No. 2019-CR-5995
Honorable Frederick D. Jones, Judge
*****
LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT Counsel for Appellant
By: Douglas Lee Harville
ROBERT S. TEW Counsel for Appellee
District Attorney
SHIRLEY M. WILSON-DAVIS
BARBARA ANN HOLLADAY-COLDIRON
Assistant District Attorneys
*****
Before PITMAN, COX, and ELLENDER, JJ.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
Rule 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from the defendant’s convictions and sentences for
second degree murder and possession of a firearm or carrying of a concealed
weapon by a person convicted of domestic abuse battery. Appellate defense
counsel has filed a “Motion to Vacate and to Set Aside Sentences and to
Remand.”
A review of the appellate record reveals that the trial court failed to
rule on the defendant’s pro se motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal,
pro se motion in arrest in judgment, and pro se motion for new trial before
sentencing the defendant, in accordance with La. C. Cr. P. arts. 821, 853,
and 861. The trial court also failed to rule on the defendant’s pro se motion
for mistrial.
Accordingly, the motion is granted, the defendant’s sentences are
hereby vacated, the appeal is dismissed, and the matter is remanded to the
trial court for further proceedings. The defendant may appeal any adverse
rulings, or any sentences subsequently imposed. State v. Jackson, 614 So.
2d 783 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1993); State v. Whitaker, 51,632 (La. App. 2 Cir.
5/25/17), 225 So. 3d 524.