Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co., 334 So. 2d 692.

36 citing documents.

White v. Robinson Lumber Co. 929 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., this court discussed the “nature” of the wrongful death action.
Classert v. Butler 746 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Walls v. American Optical Corp. 740 So. 2d 1262 La. 1999
Co., this court discussed the "nature" of the wrongful death action.
King v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 729 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Manning v. Benton 721 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See generally, Williams v. Louisiana Machinery Co., Inc., (La.App.
Office of Com'r of Ins. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 623 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Gov. 597 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Moore v. Chrysler Corp. 596 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Willis v. LeTulle 597 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Smith v. English 586 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Thomas v. Hartford Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(on rehearing); Vitale v. Checker Cab Co., 166 La.
Opelousas Scrap Materials, Inc. v. STATE, FOSTER HOMES PROGRAM 525 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Sellers v. Seligman 496 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
The trial court recognized that the beneficiaries of the decedent can have no greater rights against the defendant than the decedent himself, (La.
Ascani v. Hughes 470 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Knight v. Samuel 447 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
[3] This long standing rule has undergone no apparent change
Stephens v. State Through Dept. of Transp. 440 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
See generally, Williams v. Louisiana Machinery Co., Inc., (La.App.
Garsee v. WESTERN CAS. & SUR. CO., INC. 437 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Dulaney v. Travelers Ins. Co. 434 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Peyton v. Bogan 434 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
FRAIN AS TUTRIX OF BEASON v. State Farm Ins. Co. 421 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
: "The real issue to be resolved is whether the rule which requires the defendant to avoid a wrongful killing of the victim includes a killing which is produced in part by the defendant's conduct and in part by the victim's conduct.
Holman v. Reliance Ins. Cos. 414 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Co., as follows: Negligence is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.
Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Braxton v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Guidry v. Theriot 377 So. 2d 319 La. 1979
In more recent pronouncements by this court, these two rights have been characterized as "entirely separate and independent of each other," on original hearing; and as "two types of death actions," Callais, above, on rehearing, and in McClendon v. State, Through Department of Corrections, as "two separate and distinct actions."
Olinde v. American Emp. Ins. Co. 376 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Broyles v. Yarbrough 374 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company, 263 La.
Guidry v. Theriot 371 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Branch v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 370 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Devore v. Hobart Mfg. Co. 367 So. 2d 836 La. 1979
Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 367 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Roundtree v. Technical Welding & Fabrication Co. 364 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Criticized Carter v. Salter 351 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Billiot v. Bourg 338 So. 2d 1148 La. 1976
La.Civil Code art. 2315; (La.
Wilder v. Thrower 337 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
art. 2315; King v. Cancienne, La., ; (La.App.
Brown v. Southern Ventures Corporation 331 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
[2] , La.1975, and in which a rehearing has been granted.
Hudgins v. Travelers Insurance Co. 336 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
The final disposition of this case was de- ■ layed awaiting a (1976).