DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 So. 2d 486.

122 citing documents.

  • Belew v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 356 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., the court said: “The duty of a store owner to protect his customers from foreign substances on the floor is one of reasonable care under the circumstances.
  • Hyman v. National Super Markets, Inc. 353 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Green v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc., (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North America 351 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Dillman v. Nobles 351 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    the Louisiana Supreme Court described the order of proof required in cases such as this: when plaintiff has established that the cause of the accident was some allegedly negligent act of defendant, "(t)he burden then shifts to the defendant to go forward with t
  • Bueche v. Alvin Roys, Inc. 348 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Givens v. National Tea Co. 347 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Sansonni v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 344 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Defendant-appellant, Jefferson Parish School Board, argues that it should not *44 be held to the same standard of care as a supermarket as in Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.Sup.Ct.
  • Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc. 346 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Hutchinson v. Woolworth 345 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., and authorities therein cited.
  • Rousseau v. Deramus 342 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Gonzales v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. (La.
  • Giroir v. Pann's of Houma, Inc. 341 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Moore v. Southland Corp. 340 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., that the burden then shifted to the store owner to exculpate itself from negligence.
  • Baptiste v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 338 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Reed v. West Bros. of Eunice, L.A., Inc. 338 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    3rd Cir. 1976); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Walker v. Travelers Insurance Co. 336 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    II The decision in Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., held that evidence in slip and fall cases as to the absence or insufficiency of inspection procedures is relevant to the issue of the storekeeper’s responsibility for foreign substances on the floor, since such evidence bears on the degree of probability that the storekeeper’s failure to discover and correc
  • Ferrington v. McDaniel 336 So. 2d 796 La. 1976
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Rosensweig v. Travelers Ins. Co. 333 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc., (S.Ct.1976).
  • Distinguished Lauve v. Employers' Commercial Union Insurance 332 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    However, both Kavlich, supra, and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., are distinguishable from the instant case.
  • Calecas v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 330 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    The evidentiary problem in these cases was analyzed in Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Richardson v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc. 327 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., La., .
  • Millsaps v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 327 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The burden then shifts to the defendant to go forward with the evidence to exculpate itself from the presumption that it was negligent.” (La.
  • Payne v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 327 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The recent case of Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., decided January 19, 1976, La., has held that when a plaintiff can show facts similar to those shown by Mrs. Payne then the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts to the store to exculpate itself.