Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery, 332 So. 2d 834.

141 citing documents.

Bailey v. Bailey 708 So. 2d 354 La. 1998
Faucheux v. Faucheux 706 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bordes v. Bordes 707 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Norsworthy v. Succession of Norsworthy 704 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Hyde v. Hyde 697 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Blanchard v. Blanchard 697 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Johnson v. Wetherspoon 694 So. 2d 203 La. 1997
James & (on rehearing), this Court determined that this right to share includes not only the employee's contributions, but also the matching contributions by the employer, as this too is a community asset acquired by community earnings and efforts.
Palisi v. City of New Orleans Fire Dept. 690 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
James & Co., : In the retirement plan, separate employee accounts are not maintained.
Mercer v. Mercer 671 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
James & Co., Messersmith v. Messersmith, 229 La.
Johnson v. Wetherspoon 669 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
and held that the Court was unwilling to extend by analogy the principles applicable to the purchase of life insurance policies to the acquisition of community interests in retirement systems.
Succession of Lane 662 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
James & Co., Kambur v. Kambur, 94-775 (La.App.
Alford v. Alford 653 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Kambur v. Kambur 652 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
DeMontluzin v. Martinez 652 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
James & Co. v.] Montgomery[, ] and Sims held both private and statutory pension proceeds to be community property.
Hebert v. Hebert 650 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Brant v. Brant 649 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Futch v. Futch 643 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Goodwyne v. Goodwyne 639 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
James and Co., support a conclusion that because the amount that the defendant was entitled to receive under the CBA was computed using total years of service, the plaintiff is entitled to a propor
Minvielle v. Dupuy 638 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
James & Co., (on rehearing) (1976), the court proclaimed: [S]o long as the constractual [sic] devolution of the decedent's interest to the beneficiary does not infringe upon the legitime of a complaining forced heir nor upon the community ownership of a complaining spouse, no prohibition of law prevents the courts
Sherrill v. Sherrill 639 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Distinguished Herrington v. Skinner 640 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Mechana v. Lambert 635 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Killgore v. Killgore 635 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
McCown v. McCown 634 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Traylor v. Traylor 623 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Courtney v. Courtney 613 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Andrepont v. Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal Dist. 602 So. 2d 704 La. 1992
James & Co., (succession); Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement Bd., 265 Or.
Frazier v. Harper 600 So. 2d 59 La. 1992
Succession of Weeks ex rel. Weeks v. Lafayette General Medical Center 595 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
James & Co., to examine whether this court can enforce such a legacy.
Knecht v. Bd. of Trustees for State Col. 591 So. 2d 690 La. 1991
James & (Ala.1987); Gesina v. General Electric Corp., 780 P.2d 1376 (Ariz.Ct.App.1989); Sterling Drug Inc. v. Oxford, 294 Ark.
Williams v. Williams 590 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
James & Company, held that the husband's right to receive his retirement benefits "...
Hare v. Hodgins 586 So. 2d 118 La. 1991
James & Co., that an employee's contractual pension right is not a gratuity but a property interest earned by him.
Larsen v. Larsen 583 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Johnson v. Johnson 582 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
James & Co., on rehearing 332 So.2d at 849 (1976)
Frazier v. Harper 582 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
James & Co. v. Montgomery, *870 and decisions therein cited.
Camp v. Camp 580 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
James & Co., on rehearing, an employer provoked a concursus proceeding for distribution of proceeds from an employee's profit-sharing and retirement plans.
Succession of Netterville 579 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Hill v. Hill 575 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Fernandez v. Drez 575 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery, cited above (
Mailhes v. Mailhes 579 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
James & Co., (La.App.
Mestayer v. Williams 569 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
James & Co., for the proposition that the right to share in a deferred compensation plan, even though the benefits are due in the future, is a community asset.
Doland v. Doland 562 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Breaux v. Breaux 555 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
James & Co., (La.App.
Succession of Egan 543 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
James & Company, in that said case delt [sic] with an employer's pension plan, the same being subject to strict guidelines, as opposed to individual retirement accounts (emphasis by the trial judge).
Hebert v. Hughes Tool Co. 535 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
James & Co., Inc., et al v. Montgomery, et al
Johnson v. Johnson 532 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lachney v. Lachney 529 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
James & Co., the benefits should be classified as community to the extent attributable to years of service performed during the existence of the community.
Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
James & Co., Daggett, Policy Questions on Marital Property Law in Louisiana, 14 La.L.Rev.
Byrd v. Byrd 528 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Eskine v. Eskine 518 So. 2d 505 La. 1988