Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Price, 325 So. 2d 780.
- State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Wilson 623 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Marshall 479 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Moore 440 So. 2d 134 La. 1983
-
State v. Goza
408 So. 2d 1349
La. 1982
[1] , appeal after remand
- State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
-
State v. Showers
359 So. 2d 104
La. 1978
(a pre-Prieur trial); (La.
- State v. Nelson 357 So. 2d 1100 La. 1978
-
State v. Mitchell
356 So. 2d 974
La. 1978
(four days apart at the same location); (series of five robberies, within three weeks, of drivers for certain beverage distributor; (three weeks apart in same general area); (sixteen days apart on same street).
- State v. Frentz 354 So. 2d 1007 La. 1978
- State v. Jackson 352 So. 2d 195 La. 1977
- State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
- State v. Schwander 345 So. 2d 1173 La. 1977
-
State v. Madison
345 So. 2d 485
La. 1977
However, when an in-court identification has a source independent of the tainted procedure, it does not violate the accused's due process rights, *491 (La.1975)
- State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 1339 La. 1976
- State v. Young 337 So. 2d 1196 La. 1976
-
State v. Burnette
337 So. 2d 1096
La. 1976
In State v. Price, La., (1976), while affirming the conviction despite the use of the term "mug shot," we stated that in some circumstances the use of the term might refer to another crime in violation of Article 770 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.
-
State v. Babin
336 So. 2d 780
La. 1976
Nevertheless, we are unable to find that the reference to mug shots was so unmistakably a reference to other crimes alleged to have been committed by the accused as to require a mistrial, instead of being curable by a cautionary instruction (as offered).
- State v. Kenner 336 So. 2d 824 La. 1976
-
State v. Jones
332 So. 2d 466
La. 1976
(on rehearing); State v. Carney, 260 La.
-
State v. Johnson
333 So. 2d 223
La. 1976
The State urged that the fact that the photographs were mug shots was inadmissible ().
- State v. Anthony 332 So. 2d 214 La. 1976
-
State v. Youngblood
325 So. 2d 250
La. 1975
on the docket of this Court, pending on rehearing.