Mertens v. Mertens
Also decided on this docket: La., June 6, 1975 313 So. 2d 240
Mertens v. Mertens, 313 So. 2d 240 (La. 1975).
Cited by
Followed in 1
- Nail v. Clavier 745 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Weldon v. Weldon 737 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Shewbridge v. Shewbridge 685 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Arnold v. Airborne Freight Corp. 667 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Billeaud v. Poledore 603 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Marzula v. White 488 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Hose v. Hose 446 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Marzula v. White 431 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Bertrand v. Howard Trucking Co. 427 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Johnson v. Alexander 406 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Powell v. Barsavage 399 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
- Duffie v. Duffie 387 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Opinion text
313 So.2d 240 (1975) Richard K. MERTENS v. Camilla Doiron MERTENS. No. 56169. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 6, 1975. Writ denied. No error of law in the judgment under the facts found by the Court of Appeal. TATE and DIXON, JJ., concur. Due to the procedural posture, we cannot review the ruling of the trial court that the child's mother herself (as contrasted with the mother's mother) should not receive the custody of the child because of past irregularities. However, of course the child's mother's superior right to custody of this young child can be reasserted upon a change of circumstances, such as her remarriage.