Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Newton, 328 So. 2d 110.
-
State v. Carter
131 So. 3d 479
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We must "construe statutes so as to preserve their constitutionality, when it is reasonable to do so.” State v. Fleury, 2001-0871 (La.10/16/01), ( (on rehearing)).
- State ex rel. L.C. 126 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The legislature is presumed not to intend to enact an unconstitutional statute.” (La.
- State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
- State v. Fleury 799 So. 2d 468 La. 2001
- State v. Hair 784 So. 2d 1269 La. 2001
-
Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics
782 So. 2d 582
La. 2001
State v. Muschkat, 96-2922 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Taylor
769 So. 2d 535
La. 2000
See LeCompte, 406 So.2d at 1311 ().
-
Edwards v. Daugherty
729 So. 2d 1112
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.1/27/94)
- State v. Muschkat 706 So. 2d 429 La. 1998
- Safety Net for Abused Persons v. Segura 677 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
- State v. Larson 653 So. 2d 1158 La. 1995
-
State v. Schirmer
646 So. 2d 890
La. 1995
Original Brief of State of Louisiana, P. 7, City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 263 La.
- BP Oil Co. v. Plaquemines Parish Gov. 651 So. 2d 1322 La. 1995
- State v. Cinel 646 So. 2d 309 La. 1994
- State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
- In the Matter of American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 580 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Moore v. Roemer 567 So. 2d 75 La. 1990
-
Hondroulis v. Schumacher
546 So. 2d 466
La. 1989
1st Cir. 1971); Bums v. Board of Trustees (La.App.
-
Bd. of Dir. of La. Recovery Dist. v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, and Citizens of State
529 So. 2d 384
La. 1988
1978); Ancor v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc., 260 La.
- City of Bossier v. Gray 483 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Griffin 470 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Henry 470 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Manuel
426 So. 2d 140
La. 1983
(on rehearing); (on rehearing).
- State v. LeCompte 406 So. 2d 1300 La. 1981
-
State v. Petrovich
396 So. 2d 1318
La. 1981
Charles, supra ; State v. Everfield, supra
-
State v. Benoit
363 So. 2d 656
La. 1978
See State v. Booth, La., (1977); State v. Newton, La., (1976).
-
State v. Skinner
358 So. 2d 280
La. 1978
State v. Everfield, La., (1977); State v. Newton, La., (1976).
-
State v. Booth
347 So. 2d 241
La. 1977
See State v. Newton, La., (1976); State v. Truby, 211 La.
- State v. Felton 339 So. 2d 797 La. 1976
-
State v. Senegal
333 So. 2d 924
La. 1976
Pretermitting the propriety of raising this issue for the first time on appeal
-
Overruled
State v. Newton
328 So. 2d 120
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La, , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; he motion to quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
-
State v. Palmer
328 So. 2d 120
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La, , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
-
Overruled
State v. Bonner
328 So. 2d 121
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion to quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
-
State v. Jones
328 So. 2d 122
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
-
Overruled
State v. Jones
328 So. 2d 122
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion ot quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
-
Overruled
State v. Harris
328 So. 2d 123
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion ot quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
-
State v. Harris
328 So. 2d 124
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
-
State v. Beavers
328 So. 2d 124
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in *125 declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
-
State v. Sloan
328 So. 2d 125
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
-
State v. Kirts
328 So. 2d 126
La. 1975
For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.