Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Newton, 328 So. 2d 110.

43 citing documents.

  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    We must "construe statutes so as to preserve their constitutionality, when it is reasonable to do so.” State v. Fleury, 2001-0871 (La.10/16/01), ( (on rehearing)).
  • State ex rel. L.C. 126 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The legislature is presumed not to intend to enact an unconstitutional statute.” (La.
  • State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
  • State v. Fleury 799 So. 2d 468 La. 2001
  • State v. Hair 784 So. 2d 1269 La. 2001
  • Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics 782 So. 2d 582 La. 2001
    State v. Muschkat, 96-2922 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Taylor 769 So. 2d 535 La. 2000
    See LeCompte, 406 So.2d at 1311 ().
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.1/27/94)
  • State v. Muschkat 706 So. 2d 429 La. 1998
  • Safety Net for Abused Persons v. Segura 677 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
  • State v. Larson 653 So. 2d 1158 La. 1995
  • State v. Schirmer 646 So. 2d 890 La. 1995
    Original Brief of State of Louisiana, P. 7, City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 263 La.
  • BP Oil Co. v. Plaquemines Parish Gov. 651 So. 2d 1322 La. 1995
  • State v. Cinel 646 So. 2d 309 La. 1994
  • State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
  • In the Matter of American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 580 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Moore v. Roemer 567 So. 2d 75 La. 1990
  • Hondroulis v. Schumacher 546 So. 2d 466 La. 1989
    1st Cir. 1971); Bums v. Board of Trustees (La.App.
  • Bd. of Dir. of La. Recovery Dist. v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, and Citizens of State 529 So. 2d 384 La. 1988
    1978); Ancor v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc., 260 La.
  • City of Bossier v. Gray 483 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Griffin 470 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Henry 470 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Manuel 426 So. 2d 140 La. 1983
    (on rehearing); (on rehearing).
  • State v. LeCompte 406 So. 2d 1300 La. 1981
  • State v. Petrovich 396 So. 2d 1318 La. 1981
    Charles, supra ; State v. Everfield, supra
  • State v. Benoit 363 So. 2d 656 La. 1978
    See State v. Booth, La., (1977); State v. Newton, La., (1976).
  • State v. Skinner 358 So. 2d 280 La. 1978
    State v. Everfield, La., (1977); State v. Newton, La., (1976).
  • State v. Booth 347 So. 2d 241 La. 1977
    See State v. Newton, La., (1976); State v. Truby, 211 La.
  • State v. Felton 339 So. 2d 797 La. 1976
  • State v. Senegal 333 So. 2d 924 La. 1976
    Pretermitting the propriety of raising this issue for the first time on appeal
  • Overruled State v. Newton 328 So. 2d 120 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La, , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; he motion to quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
  • State v. Palmer 328 So. 2d 120 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La, , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
  • Overruled State v. Bonner 328 So. 2d 121 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion to quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
  • State v. Jones 328 So. 2d 122 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
  • Overruled State v. Jones 328 So. 2d 122 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion ot quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
  • Overruled State v. Harris 328 So. 2d 123 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the judgment of the district court is reversed; the motion ot quash the indictment is overruled; and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views therein expressed.
  • State v. Harris 328 So. 2d 124 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
  • State v. Beavers 328 So. 2d 124 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in *125 declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
  • State v. Sloan 328 So. 2d 125 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.
  • State v. Kirts 328 So. 2d 126 La. 1975
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Newton, La., , decided this day, the trial court’s action in declaring the statute constitutionally infirm and its action in quashing the indictment is hereby affirmed.