DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite West v. Ortego, 325 So. 2d 242.

20 citing documents.

  • Morris v. Morris 685 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In support of his arguments
  • Ramsey v. Ramsey 682 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Mercer v. Mercer 671 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Brant v. Brant 649 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Roge v. Roge 604 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Lachney v. Lachney 529 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Ellithorp v. Ellithorp 509 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    DISTRICT COURT The trial court assigned oral reasons for apportioning the personal injury settlement, (La.App.
  • Matter of Succession of Lindsey 477 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Whatley, 439 So.2d at 447 .
  • Mead v. Mead 442 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    [1] the Louisiana Supreme Court considered this former legislation with reference to a husband's recovery of workmen's compensation benefits.
  • Whatley v. Whatley 439 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    dealing with workers' compensation benefits, dealing with interest on savings certificates, both involving payments made after dissolution of the community.
  • Placide v. Placide 408 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Vincent v. Lemaire 370 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
    In West v. Ortego [ (La.
  • London v. Ryan 349 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Barton v. Barton 349 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    the court stated: *1014 “ * * * [W]here a husband’s settlement monies, acquired after dissolution of the community, but based upon a pre-dissolution, accident-related cause of action, compensate for both pre-dissolution and post-dissolution losses, that portion of the settlement which compensates for post-d
  • Hall v. Hall 349 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    in making his determination as to the nature of the funds being either separate or community property.
  • Lacaze v. Tennessee Life Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Broussard v. Broussard 340 So. 2d 1309 La. 1976
  • Broussard v. Broussard 326 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    After judgment was rendered by the trial court in the present suit, however, Chambers was modified or reversed by our Supreme Court in the recent case of West v. Ortego, La., (No. 56,232, Decided December 8, 1975).
  • McLeod v. McLeod 325 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976