DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Whitehurst, 319 So. 2d 907.

20 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    2881 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979)
  • State v. Shields 454 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Gage 399 So. 2d 1174 La. 1981
    On the basis of these brief remarks made at the hearing, a fuller explanation from the trial court of the sentences imposed appears necessary in two respects: eligibility of the defendant for probation under the appropriate law in effect at the time of the offenses, see, and the availability of concurrent, as opposed to consecutive sentences, under La.C.Cr.P.
  • Watts v. Phelps 377 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1976); on rehearing, Tate concurring at 265; see also Hargrave, "The Declaration of Rights of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974," 35 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Battaglia 377 So. 2d 264 La. 1979
  • State v. Hopkins 367 So. 2d 346 La. 1979
    In remanding the instant case for resentencing, noting that "those convicted under this statute still have available to them probation and parole.
  • State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
    State v. Whitehurst, La., (1975); State v. Terrebonne, La., (1978).
  • State v. Mallery 364 So. 2d 1283 La. 1978
  • State v. Terrebonne 364 So. 2d 1290 La. 1978
    [1] In State v. Whitehurst, La., (1975), we noted that neither probation nor parole was barred by the statute.
  • State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
  • State v. Taylor 363 So. 2d 699 La. 1978
  • State v. Wilson 362 So. 2d 536 La. 1978
    State v. Sykes , ___ So.2d ___ (La.1978) *540 No. 61,403
  • State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
  • State v. Terrebonne 354 So. 2d 1356 La. 1978
    and subsequent decisions.
  • State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
    this court noted that those convicted under this statute still have available to them probation and parole, and that failure to consider mitigating circumstances does not render the punishment cruel, unusual or excessive.
  • State v. Williams 340 So. 2d 1382 La. 1976
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 208 La. 1976
  • State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
    See State v. King, La., (1975); State v. Whitehurst, La., (1975); State v. Stetson, La., (1975).
  • State v. Victorian 332 So. 2d 220 La. 1976
  • State v. McClinton 329 So. 2d 676 La. 1976