Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guinn, 319 So. 2d 407.

24 citing documents.

Eric Borcik v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. 222 So. 3d 672 La. 2017
In other words, the LEQA sets forth both a subjective requirement—“good faith”—and an objective requirement— “reasonable belief.” See, -09 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
Rev. Stat. 14:20(A)(1); -09 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dawn R. Hargrave La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Hargrave 926 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Scott v. American Tobacco Co. 795 So. 2d 1176 La. 2001
See e.g., State v. Dumas, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/4/2001)
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Rhodes 688 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Richardson 648 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
O'NEAL v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. 580 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Latchie 535 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Agnelly 515 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Landry, supra [ ]; State v. Guinn, supra [ ].
State v. Green 505 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Mason 499 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1979); State v. Guin, [ ] supra."
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Landry, supra ; State v. Guinn, [ ] supra."
State v. Lejeune 487 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Argo 476 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
(Emphasis added) It is obvious the state legislature has provided two different standards for justifying force or violence against another and the standards hinge on whether or not there was a homicide.
State v. Zeno 469 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Payne 461 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Matthews 459 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Ducote 452 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Brockington 437 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Freeman 427 So. 2d 1161 La. 1983
State ex rel. L. S. 406 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
of preventing *645 a forcible offense against the person or a forcible offense or trespass against property in a person’s lawful possession; provided that the force or violence used must be reasonable and apparently necessary to prevent such offense, and that this article shall not apply where the force or violence results in a homicide.” In interpreting this statute, stated: “Thus, for the force or violence to be justified, the use of such must have been reasonable (an objective standard) and a
State v. Ford 368 So. 2d 1074 La. 1979