DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Luckett, 327 So. 2d 365.

23 citing documents.

  • State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (on rehearing); McCormick, supra; Pugh and McClelland, Work of the Appellate Court for the 1976-1977 Term-Evidence, 37 La.
  • Glapion v. Bergeaux 834 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In support of their argument that the contested evidence was relevant to the issues in this case, (on rehearing).
  • State v. Robinson 817 So. 2d 1131 La. 2002
    (on rehearing) ("[D]efects of capacity, sensory or mental, which would lessen the ability to perceive the facts which the witness purports to have observed, are provable to attack the credibility of the witness, either upon cross-examination or producing other witnesses to prove the defect.").
  • State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Galliano 696 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 607(C) and (D)(1); (on rehearing).
  • State v. King 604 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Dickerson 531 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Young 480 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    15:462, 486; State v. Smith, 262 La.
  • State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Joseph 463 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    stated that if the evidence is properly admitted, it is not improper for the State to refer to that evidence in their closing argument.
  • State v. Wilkerson 448 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
    State v. Richardson, 258 La.
  • State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
    (on rehearing); McCormick, supra; Pugh and McClelland, Work of the Appellate Court for the 1976-1977 Term—Evidence, 37 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Elizey 407 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
  • Gilliam v. Hayes 404 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • State v. Clark 387 So. 2d 1124 La. 1980
    State v. de la Beckwith, supra
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    State v. Luckett, La., (1976); State v. Monk, La., (1975).
  • State v. Landry 359 So. 2d 99 La. 1978
    we stated on rehearing: ".
  • State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
    State v. Luckett, on rehearing
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
    State v. Luckett, on rehearing
  • State v. Walker 344 So. 2d 990 La. 1977
    State v. Luckett, La., (1976); State v. Monk, La., (1975); State v. Richardson, 258 La.
  • State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977
  • State v. Corey 339 So. 2d 804 La. 1976
    The State alleges that the question was permissible under State v. Luckett, La., (1976) and LSA-R.S.