DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Whatley, 320 So. 2d 123.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    (rejecting defendant’s claim that Furman declassified first degree murder from being a capital offense and that he could not be tried as an adult); -79 (La.1976) (no waiver of jury or unanimous verdict permitted in Imtrial of 1972 murder, even though Furman had invalidat
  • State v. Pham 119 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 2/15/05) ; , where this Court found that a rule of evidence not invoked is waived, and, hence, a failure to object to evidence waives the objection to its admissibility; finding, as no objection was made by defense counsel at the time the prosecutor, in closing argument, referred to the testimony of a trial witness before the grand jury, the non-prejudicial error, if any, was waived by the failure to object under La.
  • State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
  • State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Carter 362 So. 2d 510 La. 1978
  • State v. Mallett 357 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978
  • State v. McZeal 352 So. 2d 592 La. 1977
  • State v. Whitmore 353 So. 2d 1286 La. 1977
    art. 703(B); State v. Whatley, La., (1975).
  • State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
    State v. Navarre, 292 So.2d (La.1974)
  • State v. Davies 350 So. 2d 586 La. 1977
    See State v. Tyler, La., (1977); State v. Moore, La., (1976); State v. Whatley, La., (1975); State v. Rhymes, La., (1973); State v. Holmes, supra.
  • State v. Lovett 345 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
  • State ex rel. Campbell 344 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 703
  • State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
  • State v. Moore 340 So. 2d 1351 La. 1976
  • State v. Smith 339 So. 2d 829 La. 1976
  • State v. Carson 336 So. 2d 844 La. 1976
    As we pointed out in State v. Whatley, La., -28 (1975), reasons of practical efficiency and fairness may often point to having the jury hear defense evidence going to the weight of the confession contemporaneously with the state's predicate laying the foundation to introduce it into evidence.
  • State v. Demourelle 332 So. 2d 752 La. 1976
    State v. Vessel, 260 La.