Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 322 So. 2d 197.

29 citing documents.

Leblanc v. 1555 Poydras Corp. 156 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2d Cir.1992); , 204 n. 2 (La.1975).
Levine v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 948 So. 2d 1051 La. 2006
204 n. 2, (La.1975), citing Gulf States Utilities Company v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp., 248 La.
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Sattar v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Goodwin v. Goodwin 607 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Fontenot 550 So. 2d 179 La. 1989
1007 n. 1 (La.1977); , 204 n. 2 (La.1975); Gulf Utilities Co. v. Dixie Elec.
FIRST FINANCIAL BANK FSB v. Boue 541 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Cary 535 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gardner 524 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hamilton 459 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Beridon 449 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
a first degree murder trial, a juror left the other jurors before the rest of the jury had been sworn and returned to his home which was nearby.
State v. Young 443 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Brannon 414 So. 2d 335 La. 1982
In State v. Nix, La., ; State v. Smith, La., ; State v. Huckaby, La., ; State v. George, La., ; and in numerous other cases, this Court found probable cause even though the affidavits had discrepancies of various magnitude.
State v. McPhate 393 So. 2d 718 La. 1981
See e. g., ; ; ; in which this Court found no abuse of discretion when the trial court denied the motions for continuance when there were three months, thirty-five working days, ninety days and three weeks respectively for counsel to prepare for trial and where there was no show
State v. Durio 371 So. 2d 1158 La. 1979
See e. g., in which this Court found no abuse of discretion when the trial court denied the motions for continuance when there were three months, thirty-five working days, ninety days and three weeks respectively for counsel to prepare for trial and where there was no showi
State v. Parker 372 So. 2d 1037 La. 1979
State v. Craighead, 114 La.
State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
State v. Dominick 354 So. 2d 1316 La. 1978
State v. Qualls 353 So. 2d 978 La. 1977
State v. Johnson 352 So. 2d 1285 La. 1977
State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
State v. Guillot 353 So. 2d 1005 La. 1977
State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 208 La. 1976
State v. Tennant, 262 La.
State v. Smith 340 So. 2d 247 La. 1976
State v. Martin 329 So. 2d 688 La. 1976
to support the proposition that where circumstances are such as to reasonably overcome the presumption of prejudice, and where it affirmatively appears that no prejudice to the accused can have resulted, the presumption may be rebutted.
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Henderson 329 So. 2d 707 La. 1976
1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970); State v. Tennant, 262 La.
State v. Winston 327 So. 2d 380 La. 1976
the trial took place three weeks after appointment of counsel, defense counsel represented defendant at his arraignment at which time the trial was scheduled 90 days later.