DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nix, 327 So. 2d 301.

104 citing documents.

  • State v. Shepard 468 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    And finally, for the proposition that the trial court has the discretion to disallow questions which are irrelevant, inflammatory or misleading to the prospective jurors.
  • State v. Murphy 465 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    : Later cases decided by the United States Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeals have carved out a clear exception to the Bruton rule in cases involving a recognized exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule.
  • State v. Rodriguez 458 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
    State v. Passman, supra ; (La.
  • State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guidry 449 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Buras 439 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2144 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1374 (1967); State v. Nix, La., , cert.
  • State v. Armstead 432 So. 2d 837 La. 1983
    State v. Arnold, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
    1970 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982); cert.
  • State v. Lewis 427 So. 2d 835 La. 1983
  • State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
  • State v. Jordan 420 So. 2d 420 La. 1982
  • State v. Brannon 414 So. 2d 335 La. 1982
    In State v. Nix, La., ; State v. Smith, La., ; State v. Huckaby, La., ; State v. George, La., ; and in numerous other cases, this Court found probable cause even though the affidavits had discrepancies of various magnitude.
  • State v. Winn 412 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
    this Court held that a defendant has no standing to complain of the manner in which the State exercises its peremptory challenges.
  • State v. Wilkerson 403 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
  • State v. Klar 400 So. 2d 610 La. 1981
    584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969); (La.
  • State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
  • State v. Franks 391 So. 2d 1133 La. 1980
  • State v. Ogden 391 So. 2d 434 La. 1980
  • State v. Bell 381 So. 2d 393 La. 1980
    per curiam on denial of rehearing (La.1976).
  • State v. Foote 379 So. 2d 1058 La. 1980
  • State in Interest of Causey 363 So. 2d 472 La. 1978
    State v. Burnette, La., (1976); State v. Nix, La., (1976).
  • State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
    This court has generally held that a pretrial in-camera inspection of the state's file is not required; see, e. g., State v. Ranker, 263 La.
  • State v. Anderson 357 So. 2d 547 La. 1978
    State v. Sierra, La., (1976); State v. Nix, La., (1975); State v. Paciera, supra.
  • State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
  • State v. Volson 352 So. 2d 1293 La. 1977
    State v. Nix, La., (1975).
  • State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
  • State v. Provost 352 So. 2d 661 La. 1977
  • State v. Henson 351 So. 2d 1169 La. 1977
    art. 643; [4] State v. Luquette, supra .
  • State v. Hatter 350 So. 2d 149 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • State v. Abney 347 So. 2d 498 La. 1977
  • State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
    State v. Nix, La., (1975).
  • State v. Hegwood 345 So. 2d 1179 La. 1977
    1976); per curiam on denial of rehearing (La.1976).
  • State v. Keys 346 So. 2d 169 La. 1977
  • State v. George 346 So. 2d 694 La. 1977
  • State v. Madison 345 So. 2d 485 La. 1977
    In Calloway we found that the trial court had properly refused to excuse for cause a venireman *493 whose nephew was a police officer, we upheld the denial of a defense challenge for cause of a prospective juror whose brother-in-law was a murder victim, where both veniremen stated they could give the accused a fair trial.
  • Distinguished State v. Passman 345 So. 2d 874 La. 1977
  • State v. Linkletter 345 So. 2d 452 La. 1977
  • State v. Tassin 343 So. 2d 681 La. 1977
    741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); cert.
  • State v. Williams 341 So. 2d 370 La. 1976
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 1302 La. 1976
    Art. 841; State v. Charles, La., (1976); State v. Nix, La., (1975); State v. Pickett, La., (1975).
  • State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
  • State v. Turner 337 So. 2d 1090 La. 1976
    State v. Nix, Mule, Fulford
  • State v. Williams 338 So. 2d 1365 La. 1976
  • State v. Sharp 338 So. 2d 654 La. 1976
    State v. Nix, Mule and Fulford
  • State v. McCray 337 So. 2d 1158 La. 1976
  • State v. Redwine 337 So. 2d 1041 La. 1976
    This measure of discretion is distinct from and additional to that vested in the trial judge in determining whether the probative value of offered photographs outweighs their possible prejudicial effect, and arises only when there is an offer to stipulate by the defendant.