Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Butler, 322 So. 2d 189.

170 citing documents.

State v. Brunet 674 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Supreme Court, ruled that an attempted murder required a finding of a specific intent to kill, because murder is defined as the killing of a person under certain circumstances.
State v. Bordenave 678 So. 2d 19 La. 1996
State v. Williams 670 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 665 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Golson 658 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State in Interest of LH 650 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Salone 648 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Harris 643 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Moore 640 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Pyke 640 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Rice 626 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Holmes 620 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Butler 618 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Brown 618 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Richardson 616 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Cavazos 610 So. 2d 127 La. 1992
State v. Serigny 610 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Owens 606 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Owens 606 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Pittman 604 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Knowles 598 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Rubin 588 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Spotville 583 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Allen 571 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Attempted second degree murder requires the specific intent to kill, and this is inconsistent with the felony murder theory of R.S.
State v. Tauzier 569 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Weiland 562 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Carter 559 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Redd 554 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
“Such intent might reasonably be implied from the intentional use of a deadly weapon to provide injuries involving serious risk of death.”
State v. Ball 554 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Byars 550 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Talbert 543 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Hickman 539 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Sheehan 515 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
[Cjourts are constitutionally bound to assure that those accused before our courts are tried in accordance with law and to reverse, where substantial error of law is committed.”
State v. Cass 514 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Odom 511 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Vanvorst 505 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 499 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
This Court, in State v. Guin, supra, found, that the improper charge constituted reversible error.
State v. Banks 496 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Wilson 495 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Byrd 491 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
559 , (1948), ‘the elements of the crime of attempted murder are specific intent to kill a human being and an overt act in furtherance of the object.’ It has, therefore, universally and without exception been held in American jurisdictions that a specific intent to kill is an essential element of the crime of attempted murder.”
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986