DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company, 146 So. 2d 647.

16 citing documents.

  • Slayton v. Grant 248 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., ; Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Cain v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, La.App., .” We find no error in the decision by the Lower Court that the accident was caused solely through the gross negligence of the defendant driver, Carl Grant.
  • Coates v. Marcello 235 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Employers Liab.
  • Gleason v. Posey 229 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Prudhomme v. Dore 223 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., ; Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., ; Cain v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, La.
  • Lambert v. Foy 224 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    1962), .” It is now well settled that the onus rests on the overtaking driver to satisfactorily exculpate himself from the presumption of negligence attending his striking a lead vehicle from the rear.
  • Viator v. Gilbert 206 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., ; Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., ; Cain v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, La.App., .
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 205 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Roberts v. Travelers Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    On authority of Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Co., La.App., , counsel for appellants makes the argument that plaintiff driver is presumed negligent because of his running into the rear of a preceding vehicle.
  • Barnes v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company 204 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., ; Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., ; Cain v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, La.App., .
  • Vander v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 192 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Murray v. Shreveport Transit Co. 188 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    (1st Cir.App.1962) and the cases cited therein.
  • Porter v. Barron 185 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    as follows: “(1) The driver of a preceding car on a highway owes no duty to the driver of the following vehicle except to use the road in the usual way in keeping with the laws of the road.
  • Kinchen v. Cottle 173 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    471 , ; and Footer v. Phoenix Insurance Co. (1962) La.App., .
  • Fontenot v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 164 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Company 161 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Co., (La.App., 1 Cir., 1962), .
  • Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation 160 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    (1st Cir.App.1962) and the cases cited therein.