Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Larue, 324 So. 2d 384.
- State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Liner 397 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
- State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
-
State v. Atkins
360 So. 2d 1341
La. 1978
[4] For cases holding that the "due diligence" requirement is ordinarily not satisfied when defense counsel fails to have the potential witness subpoenaed, see, (La.
- State v. Terry 359 So. 2d 172 La. 1978
- State v. Denney 352 So. 2d 204 La. 1977
- State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
-
State v. Lee
340 So. 2d 180
La. 1976
[5] -769 (La.1975); State v. Johnson, 261 La.
- State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
-
State v. Redwine
337 So. 2d 1041
La. 1976
This measure of discretion is distinct from and additional to that vested in the trial judge in determining whether the probative value of offered photographs outweighs their possible prejudicial effect, and arises only when there is an offer to stipulate by the defendant.
- State v. Scott 337 So. 2d 1087 La. 1976
-
State v. Cage
337 So. 2d 1123
La. 1976
403 , (1971); State v. Lynch, La., (1975); State v. Larue, La., (1975).
- Larue v. Cook 336 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
-
State v. Procell
332 So. 2d 814
La. 1976
See State v. Lynch, La., (1975); State v. Larue, La., (1975).