Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Larue, 324 So. 2d 384.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Liner 397 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
  • State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
  • State v. Atkins 360 So. 2d 1341 La. 1978
    [4] For cases holding that the "due diligence" requirement is ordinarily not satisfied when defense counsel fails to have the potential witness subpoenaed, see, (La.
  • State v. Terry 359 So. 2d 172 La. 1978
  • State v. Denney 352 So. 2d 204 La. 1977
  • State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
  • State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
    [5] -769 (La.1975); State v. Johnson, 261 La.
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
  • State v. Redwine 337 So. 2d 1041 La. 1976
    This measure of discretion is distinct from and additional to that vested in the trial judge in determining whether the probative value of offered photographs outweighs their possible prejudicial effect, and arises only when there is an offer to stipulate by the defendant.
  • State v. Scott 337 So. 2d 1087 La. 1976
  • State v. Cage 337 So. 2d 1123 La. 1976
    403 , (1971); State v. Lynch, La., (1975); State v. Larue, La., (1975).
  • Larue v. Cook 336 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
  • State v. Procell 332 So. 2d 814 La. 1976
    See State v. Lynch, La., (1975); State v. Larue, La., (1975).