Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 324 So. 2d 373.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Lucien Bazley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Kevin Abimael Guzman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
As recognized by the 24 defendant in brief, the trial court’s -99 (La.1983), which held: this court applied the long-standing federal rule in this area that a defendant in a criminal case who takes the stand in his own behalf and testifies without asserting his privilege against self-incrimination thereby waives the privilege as to the testimony given so that it may
State of Louisiana v. Gerard Ladmirault La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bazley 60 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
On the morning of the first day of the second trial, the prosecutor told the trial judge that the State intended to enter into evidence a transcript of the defendant’s
State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The State introduced the transcript of defendant’s
State v. King 760 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[2] For a discussion of burden of proof see, State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94)
State v. Bishop 734 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2008 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1968)
State v. Graves 699 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Galliano 696 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Crockett 583 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Lindsey 543 So. 2d 886 La. 1989
this court stated that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Wiley 513 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Robertson 511 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Grissom 448 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 444 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Parker 436 So. 2d 495 La. 1983
State v. Joseph 425 So. 2d 1261 La. 1983
State v. Hebert 402 So. 2d 674 La. 1981
State v. Albert 381 So. 2d 424 La. 1980
State v. Graham 375 So. 2d 374 La. 1979
State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 751 La. 1979
See, (six blacks peremptorily challenged by the State but one black venireman accepted); State v. Smith
State v. Eames 365 So. 2d 1361 La. 1979
State v. Batiste 363 So. 2d 639 La. 1978
This principle has been repeated in later cases (see, ) and remains the governing rule today, codified in C.Cr.P.
State v. Kelly 362 So. 2d 1071 La. 1978
State v. McZeal 352 So. 2d 592 La. 1977
State v. Lee 346 So. 2d 682 La. 1977
in this way: "As a minimum, it would seem that the article was intended to mask from the jury members the fact that a defendant before them had previously been tried, with their possible conclusion that he had previously been convicted."
State v. Haynes 339 So. 2d 328 La. 1976
See, (six blacks peremptorily challenged by the State but one black venireman accepted); State v. Smith
State v. Anderson 332 So. 2d 452 La. 1976
State v. Reed, La., (1975).
State v. Johnson 333 So. 2d 223 La. 1976
State v. Johnson 327 So. 2d 384 La. 1976