Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Powell, 325 So. 2d 791.
- State v. Derouselle 769 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Bennett 591 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Dorsey 561 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Keltner
542 So. 2d 42
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the defendant raised for the first time on appeal an objection to the admissibility of his confession, claiming it was not given voluntarily and was tainted by an illegal arrest.
-
State v. Grant
531 So. 2d 1121
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Art. 841; State v. *1124 Williams, (La.App.
- State v. Salgado 473 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Provo 396 So. 2d 1298 La. 1981
- State v. Marcal 388 So. 2d 656 La. 1980
- State v. Rogers 375 So. 2d 1304 La. 1979
- State v. Williams 374 So. 2d 1215 La. 1979
- State v. Sanders 357 So. 2d 492 La. 1978
-
State v. Western
355 So. 2d 1314
La. 1978
Art. 841; State v. Sosa, La., (1976); State v. Powell, La., (1976).
-
State v. Hamilton
356 So. 2d 1360
La. 1978
See State v. Marks, La., (1976); State v. Powell, La., (1976).
- State v. Holstead 354 So. 2d 493 La. 1977
-
State v. Cass
356 So. 2d 936
La. 1977
1977); State v. Williams, supra
- State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
- State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
-
State v. Anthony
347 So. 2d 483
La. 1977
State v. O'Blanc, La., (1977); State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. Marks, La., (1976); State v. Powell, La., (1976); State v. Forbes, La., (1975).
- State v. Ford 349 So. 2d 300 La. 1977
-
State v. O'BLANC
346 So. 2d 686
La. 1977
State v. Williams, supra
- State v. Williams 343 So. 2d 1026 La. 1977
- State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977
- State v. Rittiner 341 So. 2d 307 La. 1977
-
State v. Noble
342 So. 2d 170
La. 1977
art. 841; State v. Marks & Jones
-
State v. Mizell
341 So. 2d 385
La. 1976
Art. 841; State v. Marks, La., (1976); State v. Powell, La., (1976); State v. Forbes, La., (1975).
- State v. Finley 341 So. 2d 381 La. 1976
-
State v. Nicolaus
340 So. 2d 296
La. 1976
In State v. Powell, La., (1976), we stated: "It is well settled that counsel must state the basis for his objection when making it and point out the specific error which the trial court is making.
- State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
- State v. Richardson 337 So. 2d 210 La. 1976
- State v. Sockwell 337 So. 2d 451 La. 1976
-
State v. Kaufman
331 So. 2d 16
La. 1976
841 and 843 (1974); and the cases cited therein.