Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Maduell, 326 So. 2d 820.

75 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Fred Reimonenq La. 2019
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
P. art. 671(1), the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Maduell , , 824 (La.
State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Dufrene v. GAUTHREAU FAMILY LLC 28 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Deandre Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Delandro, 01-2514 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson 996 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Delandro, 01-2514 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Colton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Colton 968 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Connolly 930 So. 2d 951 La. 2006
State v. Laborde, 214 La.
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 924 So. 2d 90 La. 2006
LAGC v. LA Dept. of Agr. and Forestry 924 So. 2d 90 La. 2006
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Iverson 855 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Dept. of Agriculture v. STATE LICENSING BD. 837 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
A prompt confrontation can promote fairness ‘by assuring reliability and the expeditious release of innocent suspects.’[ 1 ] at 825 (La.).”
State v. Wilkerson 704 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated when a general statute and a specific statute deal with the same subject, the two statutes should be harmonized whenever possible.
Davis v. Louisiana State Bd. of Nursing 691 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Interest of CLS 649 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Co., Teachers' Retirement Sys.
State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Pierce v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 550 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Muntz 534 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
2658 , 53 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977)
State v. Williams 517 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Haynes 514 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Thompson 489 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Although residence in the area does not mandate that a juror be excused, the trial judge is vested with broad discretion in ruling on a challenge for cause; and this ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of abuse of that discretion.
State v. Picot 482 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
both cases involving one-on-one identifications of suspects captured very shortly after armed robberies were committed.
State v. Godfrey 476 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Bell 471 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Averette v. Jordan 457 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coburn v. Commercial Nat. Bank 453 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 444 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Austin, 258 La.
State v. Culpepper 434 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
State v. Friddle 396 So. 2d 1242 La. 1981
State v. Littleton 395 So. 2d 730 La. 1981
State v. Beavers 394 So. 2d 1218 La. 1981
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
Co., Teacher's Retirement System of La.
State v. Baldwin 388 So. 2d 679 La. 1980
Official Revision Comment for C.Cr.P.
State v. Kenner 384 So. 2d 413 La. 1980
State v. Gordy 380 So. 2d 1347 La. 1980
Official Revision Comment for C.Cr.P.
State v. Qualls 377 So. 2d 293 La. 1979
State v. Battaglia 377 So. 2d 264 La. 1979
State Ex Rel. Fields v. Maggio 368 So. 2d 1016 La. 1979
State v. LeBlanc 367 So. 2d 335 La. 1979
671(1), held that recusal under § 1 would not be justified upon mere general conclusory allegations, but the disqualifying bias, interest or prejudice must be of a substantial nature.
State Ex Rel. Bickman v. Dees 367 So. 2d 283 La. 1978