Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Williams, 331 So. 2d 438.

14 citing documents.

Keller v. Tregre 444 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jones v. Batiste 427 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
“See: Petition of Sewerage & Water Bd.
Arrendell v. Arrendell 390 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Abrams v. Rosenthal, 96 So.
Smith v. Smith 382 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the Supreme Court said: "Upon consideration of article 148 in light of its objective, we conclude that the trial court erred in declaring the article unconstitutional.
Hingle v. Hingle 369 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
119 is found in Hillard, supra, and more recently in Mr. Justice Calogero's dissent in Williams v. Williams, La.1976, 443 , asserting that C.C.
Succession of Thompson 367 So. 2d 796 La. 1979
Petition of Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, 257 La.
State v. Bradley 360 So. 2d 858 La. 1978
1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1968)
Holliday v. Holliday 358 So. 2d 618 La. 1978
Craig v. Craig 359 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
For instance, our Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Civil Code Article 148 which grants to women, but not to men, alimony pendente lite.
Castille v. Castille 358 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
Matter of Succession of Robins 349 So. 2d 276 La. 1977
See: Petition of Sewerage & Water Bd.
Thompson v. Thompson 340 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Art. 148, our Supreme Court in a recent decision in Wi7- expressed itself contrary to the views espoused by appellant.
Gravel v. Gravel 331 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976