Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Billiot v. Bourg, 338 So. 2d 1148.
- Thomas v. Highlands Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 877 La. 1993
- Miller v. Hartford Insurance Co. 567 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- L & R LEASING CO. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 561 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Frederick's Machine & Tool Shop, Inc. v. Intracoastal Seafood, Inc. 539 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Whitehead v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- Polk v. State Through DOTD 517 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Robert v. Albarado 509 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Boullion v. Romero 490 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Stevenson v. Bolton Co., Inc.
484 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., (La.
- Scott v. Ryan-Walsh Stevedoring Co. 447 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Shackman v. Daigle 447 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Shapar, Inc. v. Cliff's Wholesale Pizza Products, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- In re the Succession of Kennedy 423 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Garrison v. City of Berwick 417 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 416 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
-
Irvine v. Sentry Ins. Co.
415 So. 2d 467
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McMillan v. Travelers Ins.
- Red River Valley Bank v. Keckler 415 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Matter of Succession of Chaney 413 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Lee v. Hartford 411 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Oncale v. Clement 411 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Helaire v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 397 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Erdey v. Steib
392 So. 2d 131
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., La.App., (1977); Billiot v. Bourg, La.App., (1976).
-
Gordon v. City of New Orleans
363 So. 2d 235
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Billiot v. Bourg, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; Robertson v. Palmer, La.App., .
-
Echizenya v. Armenio
354 So. 2d 682
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[2] Billiot v. Bourg, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; Boatner v. McCrory Corp., La.App., ; Thornton v. Moran, La.App., ; Pennington v. Panepinto, La.App., ; Constance v. Smith, La.App., ; LaCour v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., La.App.
- Carter v. Salter 351 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- LeJeune v. Flash Truck Line, Inc. 353 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Betsch v. State
353 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Thus, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s opinion and we should not substitute our own, Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Bennett v. Bennett
349 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
See Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976) and Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corporation, La., (1976).
-
Musso v. ST. MARY PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DIST.
345 So. 2d 129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
We are well aware of the narrow limits in appellate review of facts, as most recently stated in Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Alexander v. Reed
350 So. 2d 179
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
We believe the following quotation from Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976) to be applicable to this case: "When as here the evidence is conflicting, an appellate court should not disturb the trier of fact's reasonable evaluation of one set of witnesses as credible, and its consequent rejection of the testimony of the opposing set of witnesses; nor should the reviewing court disturb th
-
Taylor v. Broom
345 So. 2d 1267
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring, La., (1973); Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Lamonte v. Mason
345 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Boatner v. McCrory Corp.
341 So. 2d 1174
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Harrison v. Alombro
341 So. 2d 1165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
See Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976).
-
Sea Tang Fisheries, Inc. v. Dupre Bros. Construction Co.
342 So. 2d 1175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976); Canter v. Koehring, La., (1973).
-
Tate v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc.
339 So. 2d 1329
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
In the recent case of Billiot v. Bourg, La., (1976), the Supreme Court said “nor should the reviewing court disturb the trier of facts reasonable inferences drawn from such testimony found by it to be credible.” The reasonable inference to be drawn from Mrs. Tate’s testimony is that the contaminated corn caused the subsequent illness of Symestress Tate.