DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jenkins, 340 So. 2d 157.

90 citing documents.

  • State v. Yates 357 So. 2d 541 La. 1978
    Thus, the case must be remanded for resentencing to the most serious penalty at the time for the next lesser included offense, that being second degree murder requiring life imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence for a period of twenty years.
  • State v. Robertson 358 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
  • State v. Hamilton 356 So. 2d 422 La. 1978
    3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976)
  • State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
  • State v. Thompson 354 So. 2d 513 La. 1978
    In State v. Jenkins, La., (1976), we formulated the following rule: "In determining whether information obtained by officers in the conduct of an unlawful search was used to acquire other evidence against an accused, the test to be applied is not whether, but for the illegal search the evidence would not have been obtained, but rather `"whethe
  • State v. Tapp 353 So. 2d 265 La. 1977
    we held under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct.
  • State v. Holmes 354 So. 2d 1282 La. 1977
  • State v. Scott 355 So. 2d 231 La. 1977
  • State v. Guillot 353 So. 2d 1005 La. 1977
  • State v. Lewis 353 So. 2d 703 La. 1977
  • State v. Smith 351 So. 2d 1191 La. 1977
  • State v. Brooks 351 So. 2d 1197 La. 1977
    Then, before argument of this appeal during October 1977, this Court on October 14, 1976, rendered its decision in State v. Jenkins, et al., La., .
  • State v. Singleton 352 So. 2d 191 La. 1977
  • State ex rel. Richardson v. Augustine 352 So. 2d 232 La. 1977
  • State ex rel. Waters v. Matthew 350 So. 2d 902 La. 1977
    Applicants’ conviction was affirmed on appeal under the style State v. Jenkins et al., La., , in 1976, and his transcript can be of no further help on appeal.
  • State v. Hatter 350 So. 2d 149 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • State v. Roberts 350 So. 2d 130 La. 1977
    we have concluded that the appropriate penalty to be imposed upon a valid conviction for first degree murder is the most severe constitutional penalty established by the legislature for criminal homicide at the time the offense was committed.
  • State v. Bell 346 So. 2d 1090 La. 1977
  • State v. Palmer 344 So. 2d 964 La. 1977
  • State v. Cook 345 So. 2d 29 La. 1977
    988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
  • State v. Culotta 343 So. 2d 977 La. 1977
    See: State v. Jenkins, La., (Rendered October 14, 1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 , 94 S.Ct.
  • State v. Perkins 343 So. 2d 730 La. 1977
    3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976)
  • State v. McMorris 343 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
  • State v. Williams 343 So. 2d 1026 La. 1977
  • State v. Sepulvado 342 So. 2d 630 La. 1977
    State v. Jenkins, La., (1976); State v. Davenport, La., (1976); State v. Skelton, La., (1976).
  • State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
    Then, before argument of the appeal on November 10, 1976, this Court, on October 14, 1976, rendered its decision in State v. Jenkins, et al., (1976).
  • State v. Muhleisen 340 So. 2d 572 La. 1976
    However, we must set aside defendant’s death sentence and remand the case to the district court for imposition of the most serious penalty imposable for the lesser included offense, viz., life imprisonment without eligibility for parole, probation or suspension of sentence for a period of forty years.
  • State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
  • State v. Calloway 343 So. 2d 694 La. 1976
    *696 State v. Jenkins, La., , No. 56,944 (1976).
  • State v. Roberts 340 So. 2d 263 La. 1976
    we have concluded that the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon a valid conviction for first degree murder is the most severe constitutional penalty established by the legislature for criminal homicide at the time the offense was committed.
  • State v. Washington 348 So. 2d 1251 La. 1976
    For the *1252 we have concluded that the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon a valid conviction for first degree murder is the most severe constitutional penalty established by the legislature for criminal homicide at the time the offense was committed.
  • State v. Corey 339 So. 2d 804 La. 1976
    State v. Jenkins, La., (1976); State v. Davenport, La., (1976).
  • State v. Nicolaus 340 So. 2d 296 La. 1976
    State v. Jenkins, La., (1976).
  • State v. Smith 339 So. 2d 829 La. 1976
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 208 La. 1976
    In the case of State v. Jenkins, (Waters and Paschal), No. 56,944, La., , handed down Oct.
  • State v. Davenport 340 So. 2d 251 La. 1976
    14, 1976); State v. Jenkins, La., (decided Oct.
  • State v. Smith 340 So. 2d 222 La. 1976
    we conclude that the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon conviction for first degree murder is the most severe valid penalty established by the legislature for criminal homicide at the time of the offense (March 26, 1975), La.R.S.
  • State v. Skelton 340 So. 2d 256 La. 1976
    we will remand this case with instructions to the trial court to sentence defendant to life imprisonment without eligibility for parole, probation or suspension of sentence for a period of twenty years, the sentence mandated for second degree murder at the time of the offense.
  • State v. McDaniel 340 So. 2d 242 La. 1976