DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., 328 So. 2d 367.

195 citing documents.

  • Howard v. Callahan 396 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Navratil v. Smart 400 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Reece v. Shell Oil Co. 400 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Savarese v. Bye 398 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    1095 , (1963); Accordingly, we find that the landowners owed a duty not to obstruct the vision of passing motorists; and that the landowners have not discharged their burden of proof in establishing there is no genuine issue of fact regard
  • Duvalle v. Lake Kenilworth, Inc. 396 So. 2d 1268 La. 1981
  • Rennier v. Johnson 410 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    3rd Cir. 1980); Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Williams v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 393 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
    See Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.
  • Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities 395 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The facts of Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., rehearing denied 1976, are quite different from the present case and therefore we need not dwell upon its holding.
  • Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. 394 So. 2d 1189 La. 1981
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra ; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Lear v. United States Fire Ins. Co. 392 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    However, as stated by our Supreme Court in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., this approach, which utilizes the common law classifications of invitee-licensee-trespasser is of little help, as the proper test to be applied in determining a landowner's liability under LSA-C.C.
  • Hobgood v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance 392 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. 385 So. 2d 772 La. 1980
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Lucas v. Deville 385 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    In the case of Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.
  • Giles v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 384 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    The law governing the liability of a landowner to a plaintiff injured as a result of a hazardous condition on the property has been expounded in Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, and Cates v. Bouregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.
  • Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 398 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    See Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.App.
  • Clement v. Taylor 382 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Johnson v. Edmonston 383 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.App.
  • Gamble v. Gamble 391 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Simon v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 380 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    See Cates v. Beauregard Electric Co-Operative, Inc.
  • Dore v. Cunningham 376 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Ryle v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 376 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1941); Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Chaisson v. Domingue 372 So. 2d 1225 La. 1979
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra ; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 372 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Guillotte v. Houston General Ins. Co. 368 So. 2d 1026 La. 1979
    See, Cates v. Beauregard Electric Coop., Inc., cert, denied, 429 U.S. 833 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Hamilton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 364 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    3rd Cir. 1968) in which this very same issue was disposed of on motion for summary judgment; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., in which the issue of contributory negligence was disposed of on a motion for summary judgment; and, (La.App.
  • Richard v. Sonnier 363 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    whether in the management of his property he has acted as a reasonable man in view of the probability of injury to others, and, although the plaintiff's status as trespasser, licensee, or invitee may in light of the facts giving rise to such status have some bearing on the question of liability, the status is not determinative.'" Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., at 371 (La., 1976).
  • Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton Rouge 362 So. 2d 561 La. 1978
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Barnes v. Sun Oil Co. 362 So. 2d 761 La. 1978
    1977); Cates v. Beauregard Electric Corporation, Inc., (La.
  • Pinkham v. Sherwin Williams Co. 361 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Such an acknowledgement of contributory negligence formed the basis for summary judgment in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., U. S. cert.
  • Guillotte v. Houston General Insurance 360 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Coop., Inc., cert.
  • McKowen v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 358 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    In so contending, Appellants rely upon Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., which held a 16 year old youth contributorily negligent for climbing a 30 foot utility pole to cut and remove a wire.
  • Vidrine v. White 352 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Mashburn v. Collin 355 So. 2d 879 La. 1977
    art. 966; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (La.
  • Provost v. City of Loreauville 352 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Bolden v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 349 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., Bouchon v. New Orleans Ry.
  • Bourg v. Redden 351 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    However, in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., La., (1976), the court said "We find the common law classification of invitee-licensee-trespasser to be of little help in applying C.C.
  • Lacour v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. 349 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Recently, however, the Louisiana Surpeme (sic) Court in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (1976), found the common law classifications of invitee-licensee-trespasser to be of little help in applying Civil Code Article 2315.
  • Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp. 347 So. 2d 210 La. 1977
    Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Walker v. Graham 343 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    The other Supreme Court case to which we alluded above is Cates v. Beauregard Electric Co-Operative, Inc.
  • Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc. 346 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
    Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra ; Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Acme Refrig. of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Caljoan, Inc. 346 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Lecompte v. State, Dept. of Pub. Saf. 343 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    In the recent case of Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, La., (1976) our Supreme Court stated: "Recently, however, this Court in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., noted that `[w]e find the common law classifications of invitee-licensee-trespasser to be of little help in applying C.C.
  • G. VIDRINE v. Missouri Farm Association 339 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    As stated by our Supreme Court in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., this approach, which utilizes the common law classifications of invitee-licensee-trespasser is of little help, as the proper test to be applied in determining a landowner's liability under R.C.C.
  • Morgan v. Matlack, Inc. 342 So. 2d 167 La. 1977
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  • Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 334 So. 2d 406 La. 1976
    Recently, however, this Court in Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., noted that "[w]e find the common law classifications of inviteelicensee-trespasser to be of little help in applying C.C.