Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simmons, 328 So. 2d 149.

54 citing documents.

State v. Landry 729 So. 2d 1019 La. 1999
) (remanding for retrial of the motion to suppress to provide the state with an opportunity to carry its burden "of establishing the admissibility of the defendant's confession by either showing that probable cause existed to arrest the defendant or that the causal connection between an unlawful arrest and a subsequent confession had been broken for Fourth Amendment purposes."); (remand for retrial of motion to suppress as opposed to reversal of the defendant's conviction is appropriate when the
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Gaspard 675 So. 2d 1100 La. 1996
State v. Addison 657 So. 2d 974 La. 1995
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
State v. Cabanas 552 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Salatich 548 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 479 So. 2d 344 La. 1985
State v. Garcia 477 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Explained State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Kennedy 438 So. 2d 210 La. 1983
State v. Joseph 434 So. 2d 1057 La. 1983
State v. Phipps 429 So. 2d 445 La. 1983
Explained State v. Jackson 424 So. 2d 997 La. 1982
State v. Robertson 421 So. 2d 843 La. 1982
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
State v. Harris 406 So. 2d 128 La. 1981
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
State v. Bias 393 So. 2d 677 La. 1981
State v. Bell 391 So. 2d 833 La. 1980
State v. Stevenson 390 So. 2d 1292 La. 1980
State v. Santacruz 392 So. 2d 380 La. 1980
State v. Napier 385 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
See State v. Bouffanie, supra, at 974
State v. Molinario 383 So. 2d 345 La. 1980
State v. Franklin 381 So. 2d 826 La. 1980
State v. Charles 397 So. 2d 469 La. 1980
State v. Davis 380 So. 2d 607 La. 1980
State v. Simien, 248 La.
State v. Doucet 380 So. 2d 605 La. 1979
On rehearing, we found that the trial judge erred in his refusal; however, finding no trial errors except this refusal, we did not reverse and order a new trial, but rather remanded the case to the trial court for a hearing on the motion to suppress the identification *606 reserving defendant's right to appeal an adverse ruling.
State v. Stevenson 377 So. 2d 343 La. 1979
Explained State v. Edwards 375 So. 2d 1365 La. 1979
State v. Stevenson 374 So. 2d 1189 La. 1979
In the absence of such an appeal, the conviction and sentence will be affirmed
State v. Paster 373 So. 2d 170 La. 1979
State v. Doucet 371 So. 2d 739 La. 1979
and reserve to the trial judge the power to grant a new trial if after a hearing on the motion to suppress he determines that the identification of defendant was tainted and that the testimony should have been excluded.
State v. Collins 370 So. 2d 533 La. 1979
Overruled State v. Volk 369 So. 2d 128 La. 1979
[4] In remanding the case without presently affirming or reversing the conviction
State v. Weber 364 So. 2d 952 La. 1978
See State v. Bennett, supra ; State v. Simmons, La., (1976).
State v. Bouffanie 364 So. 2d 971 La. 1978
State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 1082 La. 1978
State v. Adams 355 So. 2d 917 La. 1978
Therefore, defendant's contention that the pistol should have been suppressed was without merit, and it would serve no purpose to remand for a
State v. Bias 354 So. 2d 1330 La. 1978
State v. Hills 354 So. 2d 186 La. 1978
State v. Simien, 248 La.
State v. Franklin 353 So. 2d 1315 La. 1977
see, Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Scott 355 So. 2d 231 La. 1977
State v. Abram 353 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
State v. Bennett 345 So. 2d 1129 La. 1977
State v. Simmons 340 So. 2d 1357 La. 1976