Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Butler, 331 So. 2d 425.
- State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State v. Bullock 767 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Badie 626 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry 603 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Shows
508 So. 2d 991
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
14:3; State v. Saibold, 213 La.
-
State v. Neal
500 So. 2d 374
La. 1987
we considered whether a similar provision defining prostitution was unconstitutional for this reason.
-
State v. Russell
448 So. 2d 798
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Apparently, required proof of a specific act of intercourse in order to prove the offense of prostitution.
- State v. Morgan 389 So. 2d 364 La. 1980
- State v. Muller 365 So. 2d 464 La. 1978
-
State v. Williams
354 So. 2d 152
La. 1978
State v. Blackstone, supra
- State v. Sullivan 352 So. 2d 649 La. 1977
- State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
-
State v. Francis
345 So. 2d 1120
La. 1977
State v. Smith, La., (1976); State v. Butler, La., (1976); State v. Kaufman, La., (1976).
-
State v. Lewis
343 So. 2d 1056
La. 1977
State v. Smith, La., (1976); State v. Butler, La., (1976); State v. Kaufman, La., (1976).
- State v. McMorris 343 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
- State v. Reeves 342 So. 2d 605 La. 1977
-
State v. Clark
340 So. 2d 1302
La. 1976
State v. Smith, La., (1976); State v. Butler, La., (1976); State v. Kaufman, La., (1976).
-
State v. Guillory
339 So. 2d 970
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Prostitution is the practice by a female of indiscriminate sexual intercourse with males for compensation.” our Supreme Court decreed the above statute to be clear and constitutionally valid, although it held that proof of a specific act of intercourse was required to establish prostitution.
-
Connick v. Lucky Pierre's
331 So. 2d 431
La. 1976
No. 56,978 (decided this day), where we state that prostitution, as presently defined in La.R.S.