DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Winston, 327 So. 2d 380.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    1981) (trial judge abused his discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for continuance when a new attorney was appointed on the day of trial); (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Samir Melendez La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    Despite this discretion, “Whether a refusal to grant a continuance was justified” will “depend[] primarily on the circumstances of the particular case.” Turner, 2019-0777, p. 18, 301 So.3d at 555 ( (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dave A. Turner La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    “Whether a refusal to grant a continuance was justified depends primarily on the circumstances of the particular case.”
  • State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Snyder , 98-1078, p. 33, 750 So.2d at 856-857 , ( (La.
  • Hooper v. Hero Lands Co. 128 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Where the continuance motion is based on inadequate time for counsel to prepare a defense, this specific prejudice requirement has been disregarded only when the preparation time was “so minimal as to call into question the basic fairness of the proceeding.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Gene Ware, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    the supreme court reversed a conviction, without looking for prejudice, when defense counsel had only three days to prepare for trial.
  • State v. Ware 80 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the supreme court reversed a conviction, without looking for prejudice, when defense counsel had only three days to prepare for trial.
  • State v. Victor 82 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Id.., citing Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161 ; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no defense, but
  • State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the supreme court held that, although a trial court is given broad discretion in determining whether or not to grant a continuance, it has a burden to insure that the defendant is not surprised by the decision of the prosecutor to go to trial without adequate notice and/or full discovery.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointin
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161 ; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no defense, but
  • State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Commodore 774 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161 ; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no *857 defense
  • State v. Cockerham 671 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cannon 658 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Knight 611 So. 2d 1381 La. 1993
  • State v. Williams 605 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    State v. Simpson, supra ; State v. Ashley, supra ; writ denied, writ denied
  • State v. Williams 554 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ray 547 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Heacox 543 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ball 482 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    v. Winston, appeal after remand
  • State v. Sampson 480 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Brooks 452 So. 2d 149 La. 1984
  • State v. Brooks 431 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dupre 408 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
  • State v. Simpson 403 So. 2d 1214 La. 1981
  • State v. Meredith 400 So. 2d 580 La. 1981
  • State v. Jones 395 So. 2d 751 La. 1981
  • State v. Ordonez 395 So. 2d 778 La. 1981
  • State v. Beatty 391 So. 2d 828 La. 1980
  • State v. Durio 371 So. 2d 1158 La. 1979
    for instance, we reversed the defendant's conviction for distribution of heroin when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial.
  • State v. Parsley 369 So. 2d 1292 La. 1979
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Dees 363 So. 2d 530 La. 1978
  • State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 522 La. 1978
  • State v. MacKie 352 So. 2d 1297 La. 1977
    State v. Winston, La., (1976); State v. Carruth, La., (1975); State v. Brewer, La., (1974); State v. Williams, 262 La.
  • State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
    In one such case, appointed counsel had only three days in which to prepare for trial including an intervening Saturday and Sunday, but such a serious situation is not presented in the instant case.
  • State v. Winston 343 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
  • State v. Karno 342 So. 2d 219 La. 1977