Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harvey, 28 La. Ann. 105.
-
State v. Britton
60 So. 379
La. 1912
we say that the rule of the common law is to the effect— “that if due diligence is used, and it is made manifest that the witness is gone and cannot b'e found, or if it be proved that he was subpoenaed and fell sick by the way, his depositions may be read; for in such case he is in the same circumstances, as to the
-
State v. Wheat
35 So. 955
La. 1903
On this state of facts, this Court said:— “The admissibility of this last mentioned evidence, and its sufficiency, in connection with the sheriff’s return, to authorize the reception of Bacon’s testimony at the preliminary trial, .” In State v. Laque, 41 La.
-
State v. Kline
33 So. 618
La. 1903
1204; ; State v. Jordan, 34 La.