Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 335 So. 2d 430.
-
State v. Brooks
734 So. 2d 1232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
( ), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: Evidence of the victim's dangerous character or threats against the accused supports a plea of self-defense because it is relevant to show that the victim was the aggressor and to show that defendant's apprehension of dan
- State v. Eishtadt 531 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Whiticar 487 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Bullock
476 So. 2d 1008
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
I. Wigmore on Evidence, 363 (3rd ed.1940); McCormick on Evidence, sec.
- State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Pierce 422 So. 2d 1157 La. 1982
- State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
- State v. Jackson 419 So. 2d 425 La. 1982
- State v. Deaton 412 So. 2d 586 La. 1982
- State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
-
State v. Smith
398 So. 2d 1090
La. 1981
I Wigmore on Evidence, § 63 (3rd ed. 1940); McCormick on *1092 Evidence, § 295 (2nd ed. 1972).
-
State v. Ford
368 So. 2d 1074
La. 1979
I Wigmore on Evidence, § 63 (3rd ed. 1940); McCormick on Evidence, § 295 (2nd ed. 1972).
- State v. Trombino 352 So. 2d 682 La. 1977
- State v. Simmons 349 So. 2d 273 La. 1977
-
State v. Brent
347 So. 2d 1112
La. 1977
Although the trial judge may not usurp the jury's function by choosing to disbelieve defendant's evidence of hostile demonstration or overt act, and thereby disallow evidence which should have gone to the jury, of the victim's reputation or violent nature, see State v. King, supra , and State v. Lee, supra , the judge must determine whether any evidence shows that decedent was the aggressor in the conflict and that defendant honestly acted in self-defense.
-
State v. King
347 So. 2d 1108
La. 1977
I Wigmore on Evidence, § 63 (3rd ed. 1940); McCormick on Evidence, § 295 (2nd ed. 1972).
-
State v. James
339 So. 2d 741
La. 1976
In State v. Green, La., (1976), we defined the term "overt act" as follows: ".