Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stallings v. WH Kennedy & Son, Inc., 332 So. 2d 787.
-
Stuart v. City of Morgan City
504 So. 2d 934
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Kennedy & Son, Inc., (La.
-
University Prop. Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank
500 So. 2d 888
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Kennedy & Son, Inc., (La.
- Ryder ex rel. Cupp v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Co. 495 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Gilvin v. Arabi Cab Co. 483 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
Topole v. Eidson
464 So. 2d 406
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Kennedy & Son, Inc., (La.
- Massingale v. Sibley 449 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Quintana Petroleum Corp. v. Alpha Investments Corp.
435 So. 2d 1092
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Kennedy & Son, Inc., (La.
- McKenzie v. Standard Life Insurance Co. 422 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Doyen v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
416 So. 2d 1337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Home Insurance Co. v. Simon
411 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Barnes v. Combined Ins. Co. of America
409 So. 2d 700
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Reine v. Kearns
402 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Kennedy & Son, Inc., (La.
-
Howard v. Callahan
396 So. 2d 607
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.
394 So. 2d 1189
La. 1981
1977); Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Hobgood v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance
392 So. 2d 116
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
art. 966; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Gamble v. Gamble
391 So. 2d 848
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
art. 966; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Chaisson v. Domingue
372 So. 2d 1225
La. 1979
1977); Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc.
372 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
art. 966; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton Rouge
362 So. 2d 561
La. 1978
1977); Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
-
Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.
347 So. 2d 210
La. 1977
art. 966; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc.
- Morgan v. Matlack, Inc. 342 So. 2d 167 La. 1977
-
Montgomery v. Vantiger
340 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
“It is important, and ordinarily essential, that the trier of fact be afforded the opportunity to observe the demeanor, during direct and cross-examination, of a witness whose subjective motive is at issue.” Stallings v. W. H. Kennedy & Son, Inc., and Roy &