DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Trahan, 332 So. 2d 218.

23 citing documents.

  • State v. Mullen 269 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State in the Interest of C.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State ex rel. C.D. 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State Ex Rel. Cd 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Trent Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    13:3714: the court explained that, because the medical records rule is an exception to the hearsay rule created by statute, it is essential that all of the formalities prescribed in the statute be followed before such records are admissible in evidence.
  • State v. Miller 940 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    13:3714: the court explained that, because the medical records rule is an exception to the hearsay rule created by statute, it is essential that all of the formalities prescribed in the statute be followed before such records are admissible in evidence.
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
  • Trueman v. City of Alexandria 818 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wilkinson 772 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    the court explained that, because the medical records rule is an exception to the hearsay rule created by statute, it is essential that all of the formalities prescribed in the statute be followed before such records are admissible in evidence.
  • State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Guillot 526 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Mayeux 526 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Berluchaux 522 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
  • State v. Jackson 482 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    held that, because the medical records rule is a statutory exception to the hearsay rule, it is essential that all of the formalities prescribed in the statute be followed before such records are admissible in evidence.
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stevenson 447 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lee 446 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    State v. O'Brien, 255 La.
  • State v. Walker 376 So. 2d 92 La. 1979
  • State v. Andrews 369 So. 2d 1049 La. 1979
    13:3714; nor any business record exception, were even arguably applicable.
  • State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
  • State v. Wientjes 341 So. 2d 390 La. 1976