Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling, 334 So. 2d 420.

18 citing documents.

  • Biedenharn v. Culp 911 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Quantum meruit may well have been an ill-considered importation from the common law (); however, no great harm follows from that importation if we understand that numerous cases in our jurisprudence have used "quantum meruit" as a descriptive term, descriptive of the equitable principles of contract interpretation enunciated in La.Civ.Code arts.
  • Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    995 , (1971); Oil Purchasers
  • Fogleman v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. 638 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Morphy, Makofsky & Masson, Inc. v. CANAL PLACE 2000 538 So. 2d 569 La. 1989
    Quantum meruit may well have been an ill-considered importation from the common law (); however, no great harm follows from that importation if we understand that numerous cases in our jurisprudence [10] have used "quantum meruit" as a descriptive term, descriptive of the equitable principles of contract interpretation ennunciated in La.Civ.Code arts.
  • Schouest v. Franke 526 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Art. 3078; Oil Purchasers
  • Percy v. Perkins 468 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    art. 3078; Oil Purchasers, (La.App.
  • Salling Wiping Cloth Co. v. Sewell, Inc. 419 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    In Oil Purchasers, Inc., v. Keuhling, (La.
  • Criticized Porter v. Johnson 408 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Oil Purchasers, criticized "quantum meruit" as an ill-considered importation from the common law and classified a claim in that suit for reduction of a fee stipulated in an employment contract as "actio de in rem verso", recognized in Minyard and Edmonston, supra.
  • Distinguished Greene v. Greene 373 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Landry Oil & Gas Co. v. Neal, supra; Oil Purchasers, McDonald v. Richard, supra; Fawvor v. Crain, supra.
  • Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 373 So. 2d 102 La. 1979
  • Calk v. Highland Construction & Manufacturing, Inc. 368 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1 Cir. 1973), writ denied, La., ; Oil Purchasers
  • West Baton Rouge Parish Sch. Bd. v. TR Ray, Inc. 367 So. 2d 332 La. 1979
    See also, Oil Purchasers, Tate, The Louisiana Action for Unjustified Enrichment: A Study in Judicial Process, 51 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Spiller v. Herpel 357 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Oil Purchasers, Edmonston v. A-Second Mortgage Company of Slidell, Inc., Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc., 251 La.
  • Capitano v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. 359 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 353 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Schaff v. Landers 355 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    We are not unaware of the admonition of Succession of Butler, La.1974, , that the trial judge in attorney’s fee cases has broad discretion in fixing “quantum meruit” (a theory of recovery questioned by Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling, La.1976, ).
  • Due v. Due 342 So. 2d 161 La. 1977