Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Page, 332 So. 2d 427.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Ebone Shirley Wilson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Wilson 254 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Re Matter Under Investigation 15 So. 3d 972 La. 2009
a case originating with the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, we recognized that although the underlying basis for declaring a person an habitual offender under the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law, a criminal proceeding, also involves drivers license revocation proceedings which occurred because o
CITY OF BROUSSARD VERSUS MICHAEL WATKINS/dba Michael's International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
the supreme court was called upon to determine whether a license revocation proceeding under the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law was civil or criminal.
City of Broussard v. Watkins 869 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
the supreme court was called upon to determine whether a license revocation proceeding under the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law was civil or criminal.
State v. Carr 761 So. 2d 1271 La. 2000
Bossier, Inc., 95-2075 (La.7/2/96), ( (La.
Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. Foster 711 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
[10] As an aside, in which we held that proceedings to revoke local licenses to drive a motor vehicle, a corollary administrative action, are generally regarded as civil proceedings.
Chevalier v. LH Bossier, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1072 La. 1996
[4] (This court, relying on fact that no loss of liberty, incarceration, or fine could result, found petition filed by district attorney to revoke driver's license pursuant to Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law, La.R.S.
Meilleur v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 613 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
It stated, that “a driver’s license suspension is civil,” and that “the motorist suffers no loss of liberty, no incarceration or fine as a result of the suspension or revocation of his license but merely forfeits the privilege of driving on public highways of the state.”
Butler v. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS 609 So. 2d 790 La. 1992
1586 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971)
Mitchell v. State, Department of Public Safety, License Control & Driver Improvement Division 476 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Glazer v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Employees 431 So. 2d 752 La. 1983
590 , 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958) (a statute has been considered nonpenal if it imposes a disability, not to punish, but to accomplish some other legitimate governmental purpose); (La.
State v. Stafford 394 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
State v. Bates 391 So. 2d 1164 La. 1980
this Court addressed the question of whether the license revocation proceeding authorized by R.S.
State v. Woodard 387 So. 2d 1066 La. 1980
The statute is civil in nature
State v. Lair 389 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
and Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 , 91 S.Ct.
Braud v. State 392 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
While due process is required before a driver’s license may be revoked, we do not agree with the defendant’s argument that the statute is so unconstitutionally vague as to violate his due process rights.
State v. Vickers 385 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State v. Lattier 377 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
State v. Bradley 360 So. 2d 858 La. 1978
32:1472 are not "prosecutions;" they are civil proceedings ( ).
State v. Edwards 353 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
and Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Skyeagle 345 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Fontenot v. State, Dept. of Public Safety 341 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
State v. Williams 332 So. 2d 432 La. 1976
The state applied for writs to this Court which were granted, No. 57,256, decided this day.