Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Alfred, 337 So. 2d 1049.

33 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Walter Johnson La. 2021
State v. Papizan 256 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See State v. Alfred , , 1057 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Justin Seawright La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2182; (1976) [on rehearing].
State v. Noel 151 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. McQuirter 108 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Barker, supra, and [State v.] Alfred, [ ] supra.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 , (1972)
State v. Hayes 75 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
-1057 (La.1976) (on rehearing).
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
This court noted: As stated by the supreme court in Alfred, [1976], incarceration and the deprivation of liberty resulting therefore is always prejudicial.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
This court noted: As stated by the supreme court in Alfred, [1976], incarceration and the deprivation of liberty resulting therefore is always prejudicial.
State v. Chisolm 983 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
2182 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 101 ]; (1976), [on rehearing].
State v. Gibson 971 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
2182 ; (1976) [on rehearing].
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Love, 00-3347 (La.App.
State v. Alexander 875 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
2182, 2191-2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sigmund L. Van Dyke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the supreme court stated: Prejudice to the Defendant None is alleged.
State v. Keller 859 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
decision [] to deny the motion to quash.
State v. Van Dyke 856 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the supreme court stated: Prejudice to the Defendant None is alleged.
State v. Harris 857 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
2182 ; (1976) [on rehearing].
State v. Love 847 So. 2d 1198 La. 2003
Under procedural circumstances strikingly similar to those presented by the instant case, admittedly with three justices dissenting, this court rejected a (on rehearing), that the district attorney had misused his powers to enter a nolle prosequi, then reinstitute charges, stating as follows: The per curiam of the trial judge assigned additional reasons which apparently influenced his action [to grant a motion to quash].
State v. Cyrex 746 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Myers 584 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
2182, 2188 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101
State v. Foat 442 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
2182, 2188 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101
State v. Albert 430 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court adopted the flexible approach espoused in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct.
State v. Walgamotte 415 So. 2d 205 La. 1982
More recently, (On rehearing), we noted specifically at 1055-1056: ...
State v. Falkins 395 So. 2d 740 La. 1981
State v. James 394 So. 2d 1197 La. 1981
State v. McMahon 391 So. 2d 1120 La. 1980
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
State v. Reaves 376 So. 2d 136 La. 1979
175, 202 (1967) ("[Art. 535(B)] covers expiration of the trial limitation upon the commencement of trial, a rule implementing the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial.")
State v. Kemp 359 So. 2d 978 La. 1978
State v. Alfred, La., (1976); State v. Howard, La., (1976); State v. Moore, La., (1974).