Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 334 So. 2d 406.
-
Melerine v. State
505 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, *81 Inc., cert.
-
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
501 So. 2d 869
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
471 , (1962); Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
-
Henry v. Safeco Ins. Co.
498 So. 2d 1116
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
In Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., our Supreme Court stated, at page 410, that a landowner has a duty to act reasonably in view of the probability of injury to others, but that a landowner is not to insure against the possibility of an accident on his premises.
- Van Pelt v. Morgan City Power Boat Ass'n, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Forest v. STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 493 So. 2d 563 La. 1986
- Bradford v. CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INS. CO. 493 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Gadman v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Gadman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Deville v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co.
492 So. 2d 895
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
-
McCormick v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co.
488 So. 2d 491
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
-
Mayeur v. Time Saver, Inc.
484 So. 2d 192
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
-
Francois v. Ybarzabal
483 So. 2d 602
La. 1986
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, *606
-
Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp.
479 So. 2d 904
La. 1985
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
- Luneau v. Hanover Ins. Co. 478 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Murphy v. State 475 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Spurlock v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket
475 So. 2d 20
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
-
Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp.
468 So. 2d 695
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
art. 2133; Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.
- Fusilier v. Northbrook Excess & Surplus Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
Francois v. Ybarzabal
469 So. 2d 1001
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
See Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, American Ins.
-
Broussard v. Yellow Freight Lines, Inc.
464 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
- Mumphrey v. Rollins 468 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Vicknair v. Hibernia Building Corp.
459 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., American Ins.
-
Thompson v. Ewin
457 So. 2d 303
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
- Dunne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 444 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc. 445 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Parr v. Head 442 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
-
Williams v. Savoie
441 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The appellants argue that Milan owed Williams a duty as a landowner and cites the analysis of the duty-risk approach found in Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (La.App.
-
Guillot v. Fisherman's Paradise, Inc.
437 So. 2d 840
La. 1983
See also Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Crowe v. Hoover
434 So. 2d 1231
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
-
Jacoby v. State
434 So. 2d 570
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 2133; Wheat v. Ford, Bacon and Davis Construction Corp., (La.App.
-
Williams v. City of New Orleans
433 So. 2d 1129
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc.
433 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
The Supreme Court in Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, interpreted this provision as follows: "The article does provide that by answering an appeal, an appellee, without filing an appeal on his own behalf, may seek relief from any portion of the judgment rendered against him in favor of the appellant.
- Miller v. Broussard 430 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Farr v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- LeBlanc v. Wall 430 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Palmer v. Bartley, Inc.
430 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
NOTES [1] See Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Kearns v. Republic Insurance Co.
428 So. 2d 1149
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
We are mindful of the Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, that: “.
-
Hoffpauir v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
427 So. 2d 560
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
[3] See Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.
-
Gibson v. Faubion Truck Lines, Inc.
427 So. 2d 68
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Buckley, supra, Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
-
Gums v. Delta Downs, Inc.
425 So. 2d 303
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Smith v. Fusilier
424 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3 Cir.1980), this Court held: “Thus, in determining the duty owed by the landowner to the plaintiff, it is not necessary to classify plaintiff as an invitee, but rather it is appropriate to ascertain this duty by examining the particular facts before us. Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, supra [ ]; Vidrine v. Missouri Farm Association, supra [ ].
-
Chapman v. Gulf Ins. Co.
425 So. 2d 277
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
App. 3 Cir.1982), writ denied, writ denied, Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Ruffo v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC.
424 So. 2d 470
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
(1976): It is well settled that for alleged wrongful conduct to be actionable negligence it must be found to be a cause in fact of the resulting harm...
-
Allen v. Housing Authority of New Orleans
423 So. 2d 1291
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Dunn ex rel. Dunn v. Foster
422 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
-
Epting v. HDO, Inc.
422 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
This standard was later applied in Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. CHAMPION CHEM., INC. 420 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Naylor v. La. Dept. of Public Highways
423 So. 2d 674
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
-
Guillory v. Audubon Ins. Co.
417 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
our Supreme Court noted: "It is well settled that for alleged wrongful conduct to be actionable negligence it must be found to be a cause in fact of the resulting harm.
-
Crowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
416 So. 2d 1376
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
[2] See Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.