DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Waddles, 336 So. 2d 810.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
    State v. Harris, supra; (La.
  • State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, I.e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they (the two crimes) are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, I.e., `so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they (the two crimes) are the work of the same person,' (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
  • State v. James 396 So. 2d 1281 La. 1981
  • State v. Walker 394 So. 2d 1181 La. 1981
  • State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
  • State v. Martin 377 So. 2d 259 La. 1979
    See also: (docket no. 58,054, November 8, 1976)
  • State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
  • State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
    In order to be admissible to prove identity the other crimes must be distinctively similar in system, or "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that [the two crimes] are the work of the same person."
  • State v. Showers 359 So. 2d 104 La. 1978
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, — i. e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
  • State v. Frentz 354 So. 2d 1007 La. 1978
    "As the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, —i. e., `so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person,' (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Carter 352 So. 2d 607 La. 1977
    1977); State v. Moore, supra
  • State v. Jackson 352 So. 2d 195 La. 1977
    As the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, —i. e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
    As the jurisprudence has clarified, not only must the other crime be distinctively similar in system, but the proof of the other crime as part of the system must be relevant to prove a fact of consequence to the accused's present innocence or guilt (independent of the inadmissible purpose to infer that the accused committed the present crime because he had committed
  • State v. Ledet 345 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
    State v. Gaines, supra ; State v. Slayton, supra ; State v. Moore, supra
  • State v. Slayton 338 So. 2d 694 La. 1976
  • State v. Frederick 340 So. 2d 1353 La. 1976
    See also: (docket no. 58,054, November 8, 1976)