Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 336 So. 2d 867.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
In that case, the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that references during trial to 3 State v. George, 95-110 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brent M. Braneon Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State v. Carter 257 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Smith , , 868-70 (La.
State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-70 (La.1976) (per curiam); see also State v. Stelly, 93-1090 *1178 (La.App.
State v. Duong 148 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Pierce, supra, State v. Campbell, supra
State v. Adams 142 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Montoya, 340 So.2d at 560 .
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Joseph 71 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 771, nor, did it mention a case that it decided just prior to Montoya
State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Allen 5 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out that Article 770 does not apply to references to a defendant’s post-arrest silence by the prosecutor or by witnesses, but only applies to references to the defendant’s failure to testify at trial.
State v. Longo 8 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , , writ denied, 94-1211 (La.9/23/94), ; -70 (La.1976)).
State of Louisiana v. Amar St. Germain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out that Article 770 does not apply to references to a defendant’s post-arrest silence by the prosecutor or by witnesses, but only applies to references to the defendant’s failure to testify at trial.
State v. Valentine 929 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Olivieri 860 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
1 Cir.4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-1211 (La.9/23/94), ; -870 (La.1976).
State v. Jones 648 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out that Article 770 does not apply to references to a defendant's post-arrest silence by the prosecutor or by witnesses, but only applies to references to the defendant's failure to testify at trial.
State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Troulliet 643 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Stelly 635 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Moreno 619 So. 2d 62 La. 1993
State v. Mays 612 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
a police officer who had interviewed the defendant testified that the defendant refused to give a statement to the officers.
State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Carroll 546 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
as requiring the statement made by Officer Guillot to constitute reversible error.
State v. Hicks 483 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Kersey 406 So. 2d 555 La. 1981
State v. Mattheson 407 So. 2d 1150 La. 1981
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Darby 403 So. 2d 44 La. 1981
State v. Procell 365 So. 2d 484 La. 1978
State v. Brown 354 So. 2d 516 La. 1978
State v. Lynch 343 So. 2d 1062 La. 1977
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) (even assuming the colloquy as to the location of the burglary tools could be interpreted as such inadmissible testimony).