Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Procell, 332 So. 2d 814.
- State Of Louisiana v. Carl Thompson, II La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Armentor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Deandre Thornton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Stacy Tyrone Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Cannon
267 So. 3d 585
La. 2019
1984) ; State v. Procell , (La.
- State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Matthews 552 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Jacko 444 So. 2d 1185 La. 1984
-
Overruled
State v. Boyd
359 So. 2d 931
La. 1978
the venire should be quashed because the jury commissioners themselves did not place the names of persons who were exempt from jury service on the jury venire, thereby excluding certain persons qualified to serve on juries, but who might be exempt from service.
- State v. Lawrence 351 So. 2d 493 La. 1977
-
State v. Daigle
344 So. 2d 1380
La. 1977
401-419; Rules of the Supreme Court XXV and XXVI.
-
State v. Durr
343 So. 2d 1004
La. 1977
The "error or defect" that the defendant "discovered" which was rendered subsequent to the verdict of guilty in this case.
- State v. Reid 340 So. 2d 551 La. 1976
-
Distinguished
State v. Jenkins
340 So. 2d 157
La. 1976
wherein we reversed a conviction by a jury chosen from a venire from which the jury commission had purposely excluded all exempt persons.
-
State v. Cage
337 So. 2d 1123
La. 1976
wherein we held that "[i]n the context of jury selection, due process requires only that the defendant be afforded with a jury from which there has been no arbitrary exclusion of any particular group of individuals * * *" (emphasis added), wherein we reversed a conviction by a jury from which the jury commission had intentionally excluded those whom it anticipated would claim exemptions from jury service.
- Larue v. Cook 336 So. 2d 871 La. 1976