Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lockett, 332 So. 2d 443.
- State v. Hendricks 882 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Gladney
577 So. 2d 1179
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
435 , 78 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983)
-
State v. Burns
504 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
As *134 : The Articles of the Code referred to above [La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Clark
437 So. 2d 879
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
: The Articles of the Code referred to above [La.C.Cr.P.
- State v. Willie 410 So. 2d 1019 La. 1982
- State v. Morris 404 So. 2d 1186 La. 1981
- State v. Bretz 394 So. 2d 245 La. 1981
-
State v. Clark
387 So. 2d 1124
La. 1980
art. 774; State v. Smith, 257 La.
-
State v. Simms
381 So. 2d 472
La. 1980
we found that the prosecutor's remarks made during closing argument, that undercover police officers and informants risked their lives to protect the interest of society, did not violate the requirement under La.Code Crim.P.
-
State v. Hamilton
356 So. 2d 1360
La. 1978
*1365 The State makes the further argument that the prosecutor's remarks were provoked by the defense counsel's closing argument, : ".
- State v. Brown 352 So. 2d 690 La. 1977
- State v. Klein 351 So. 2d 1158 La. 1977
-
State v. Schouest
351 So. 2d 462
La. 1977
art. 921; State v. Dennis, 250 La.
- State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
-
State v. De La Beckwith
344 So. 2d 360
La. 1977
art. 774 (1966); State v. Smith, 257 La.
- State v. Unzueta 337 So. 2d 1102 La. 1976