DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pearson, 336 So. 2d 833.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    -44 (La.1980); -94 (La.1976).
  • State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    State v. Hills , , 743-44 (La.1980) ; see also State v. Pearson , , 835 (La.1976) ; State v. Ghoram , , 93-94 (La.
  • State v. Patterson 191 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    This court has noted that “[e]ven when the witness is determined to be unavailable, the use of the prior testimony must not violate the defendant’s right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment.” Johnson , 13-0343 at pp. 18-19, 151 So.3d at 695 (-44 (La.1980); ).
  • State v. Johnson 151 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Vallo 117 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    -44 (La.1980); -94 (La.1976).
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    -44 (La.1980); -94 (La.1976).
  • State v. Kennedy 957 So. 2d 757 La. 2007
  • State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Gatch, 27,701 (La.
  • State v. Robinson 811 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    As we have stated in State v. Pearson, [ ,] 835 [(La.1976),] ‘One reason that this right is so fundamental to our law is that it guarantees that the witnesses who participate in the deprivation of a person’s freedom present themselves in person before the jury so that the jurors can observe their demeanor and decide whether they should be believed.’ This fac
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
  • State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Gatch, 27,701 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0810 (La.9/20/96), .
  • State v. Magouirk 539 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. In the Interest of R.C. 494 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. RC 494 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nall 439 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
    1976); where the witness is physically or mentally ill, if the witness is absent and cannot with due diligence be found, if the witness persistently refuses to testify, or if the witness refuses to testify on the ground of recognized privilege
  • State v. Morgan 367 So. 2d 779 La. 1979
    failure to make the motion is considered a waiver of the error
  • State v. Smith 357 So. 2d 524 La. 1978
  • State v. Sylvester 343 So. 2d 1020 La. 1977
    They cite Article 295 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which allows the admission under certain circumstances of a witness' testimony recorded at a preliminary hearing, [4] and they rely on our decisions in State *1022 v. Pearson, which allow the introduction in certain circumstances at defendant's second trial of the testimony recorded at his first trial.