Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bias, 337 So. 2d 426.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 1993), this court stated: “The often repeated purpose of the rule is to prevent witnesses from being influenced by prior testimony and to strengthen the role of cross-examination in developing the facts.”
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Evins 626 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State in Interest of RC 514 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Rigsby 484 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Scroggins 465 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Lewis 367 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
State v. Washington 363 So. 2d 509 La. 1978
State v. Washington 363 So. 2d 509 La. 1978
State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
State v. Bolton 354 So. 2d 517 La. 1978
State v. Bias 352 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
State v. Bell 346 So. 2d 1090 La. 1977
See, Official Revision Comment (b) of Article 764; (La.
State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
State v. Chenier 343 So. 2d 177 La. 1977
1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
State v. McDaniel 340 So. 2d 242 La. 1976
State v. Coleman, 254 La.
State v. Ford 338 So. 2d 107 La. 1976
See, e.g., State v. Bias, La., (1976); State v. Simmons, La., (1976).