Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strange, 334 So. 2d 182.
-
State of Louisiana v. Deonta Ware
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
ated: ‘There was certainly no error in the prosecutor’s calling to the jury’s attention the failure of the other party to call a witness (as long as the prosecutor did not improperly comment on the failure of the defendant to testify.)’ See also, ” The prosecutor’s rebuttal comments concerning the failure of the defendant to call witnesses was not prohibited.
- State v. Schexnayder 167 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
- State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Daniels 740 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Castille 590 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Christopher 561 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Zone 511 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Robinson
480 So. 2d 329
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1981) at footnote 9, the court stated: *337 ‘There was certainly no error in the prosecutor’s calling to the jury’s attention the failure of the other party to call a witness (as long as the prosecutor did not improperly comment on the failure of the defendant to testify.)’ See also, ” The prosecutor’s rebuttal comments concerning the failure of the defendant to call witnesses was not prohibited.
- State v. Downer 460 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
-
State v. Simone
428 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Also, at footnote 9, the court stated: “There was certainly no error in the prosecutor’s calling to the jury’s attention the failure of the other party to call a witness (as long as the prosecutor did not improp *1229 erly comment on the failure of the defendant to testify).” See also
- State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
- State v. Ludwig 423 So. 2d 1073 La. 1982
- State v. Morris 404 So. 2d 1186 La. 1981
- State v. Hillard 398 So. 2d 1057 La. 1981
- State v. Gaut 357 So. 2d 513 La. 1978
- State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
-
State v. Schouest
351 So. 2d 462
La. 1977
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Hubbs, 261 La.
- State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977