Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Owen v. Owen, 336 So. 2d 782.

45 citing documents.

Nick Alan Natali v. Ricky Lynn Huval, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Gregory Jackson Versus Darryl A. Sumlin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Manichia, 45 So.3d at 622; (La.
Derrick R. Breston v. Dh Catering, LLC, Delisa Hayes, Robert P. Schmidt, Mufeed, LLC, and Xyz Insurance Companies … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
2016) (wherein the federal district court observed, “Louisiana law generally requires that proof of an interest in immovable property be in writing and recorded to be effective against third persons.”); (La.
Succession of Charles B. Fanz, Jr. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Raymond C. Davis v. Robert St. Romain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Davis v. St. Romain 222 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Tate v. Tate 180 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-88 (La.1976) and Mathews v. Mathews, 35,-984, pp. 4-5 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/02), -21 ; see also Sonnier v. *437 Conner, 43,811, pp. 25-27 (La.App.2d Cir.12/3/08), -61 , writ denied, 09-0309 (La.4/3/09), .
Pazmino v. Succession of Pazmino 171 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Ruel v. Dalesandro 152 So. 3d 893 La. 2014
-87 (La.1976); Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
Longleaf Investments, L.L.C. v. Tolintino 108 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Tate v. Tate 68 So. 3d 513 La. 2011
Mathews v. Mathews, 35,984 (La.App.
Manichia v. Mahoney 45 So. 3d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Owen v. Owen (La.1976), .
Johnson v. UNOPENED SUCCESSION 969 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Trident Oil & Gas Corp. v. John O. Clay Exploration, Inc., (La.App.
Virgie Mae Bertrand Trahan, Individually and as Administratrix of the Succession of Olivia Bellard Bertrand v. Alfred Louis … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 1975), reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
Trahan v. Bertrand 952 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir.1975), reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
Mathews v. Mathews 817 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Scoggins v. Frederick 744 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Ridgedell v. Succession of Kuyrkendall 740 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Trident Oil & Gas Corp. v. John O. Clay Exploration, Inc. 622 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Succession of Doll v. Doll 593 So. 2d 1239 La. 1992
(The Code articles on donations apply to the disguised donation).
Schudmak v. Prince Phillip Partnership 573 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Bonnett v. Mize 556 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Burford v. Burford 541 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Hogan v. McKeithen 527 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Manion v. Pollingue 524 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
explained the difference between a simulated sale and a donation in disguise as follows: "In our law, a simulation is a transfer of property which is not what it seems.
Succession of Cloud 508 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Chachere v. Superior Oil Company, 192 La.
Waterbury v. Waterbury 496 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Frazier v. Frazier 499 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Bordelon v. Bordelon 499 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
explained the difference between a simulated sale and a donation in disguise as follows: "...
Watterson v. Magee 498 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Winters v. Jean-Batiste 491 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated, that: “In our law, a simulation is a transfer of property which is not what it seems.
Trentacoste v. Elmer 480 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
A valid transfer has taken place, but its form is a donation rather than a sale and the Code Articles on donations apply to the transfer”
Brumfield v. Brumfield 457 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Moore v. Moore 427 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Edmonson v. Abell 423 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hysmith v. Coleson 421 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the Supreme Court stated: "...
Succession of Marcel 421 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Ellis v. Benedict 408 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
however, the supreme court made the following comments regarding the court of appeal's determination that the Owen donation was a donation omnium bonorum: "In order to sustain an attack on a gift as a donation omnium bonorum, the heirs must prove conclusively that the donation divested the donor of all of h
Succession of Riggio 395 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1978), writ denied
Attaway v. Culpepper 386 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Harris v. Ferguson 375 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Blossman v. Olsen 365 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
the court said: “In our law, a simulation is a transfer of property which is not what it seems.
Quinn v. Stafford 357 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
[8] The Potts case, supra, was cited with approval by the Supreme Court in Owen v. Owen, La., , (1976).
Reed v. Thomas 355 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
City Bank & Trust Co. v. Caneco Const., Inc. 341 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
See also the recent case of Owen v. Owen, La., in which our Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule that in the absence of fraud, actual knowledge does not negate the third person's right to rely on the public record.