Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Dillon 72 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Marshall 70 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Baker 71 So. 3d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 |2Four days later, on September 20, 2010, the defendant entered a thus reserving his right to seek appellate review of the trial court’s ruling on his motion to suppress.
State v. Stephens 71 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
so that he could appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home.
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. G. T., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Thereafter, Defendant returned to court, to preserve his right to contest the trial court’s denial of his oral motion to declare unconstitutional the majority verdict law.
State v. GT, JR. 71 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Thereafter, Defendant returned to court, to preserve his right to contest the trial court’s denial of his oral motion to declare unconstitutional the majority verdict law.
State v. Parker 71 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ball 71 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Burton 71 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Also on that date, defendant pled guilty to Count 1, and withdrew his not guilty plea and pled guilty to Count 2
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Eaglin AKA Eaglin Thomas AKA Thomas H. Eaglin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Ronald J. Ourso La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Joseph Ourso La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ourso 67 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ourso 67 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Craig 66 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Additionally, although the trial court denied defendant’s motions to suppress his statement and several identifications, defendant did not preserve these rulings, or any other rulings
State v. Williams 67 So. 3d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Caulfield 67 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, following the denial of his motions to suppress, on July 20, 2010
State v. Tolbert 66 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Mr. Tolbert then withdrew his prior plea of not guilty and pled guilty as charged, to appeal the denial of his motion to quash the bill of information.
State v. Garcia 66 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Vargas 66 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Kirk Antoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
There is no indication, anywhere in the record, that Defendant’s plea was taken pursuant to State 3 v. Crosby, therefore, any procedural irregularities or pretrial errors are waived.
State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The record does not contain any pretrial motions filed by defendant
State v. Dickerson 65 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Defendant was re-arraigned and pled guilty to the amended charge on April 21, 2010
State v. Banks 64 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 893 reserving his right to seek review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress.
State of Louisiana v. Chad R. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In his brief, Defendant alleges that, when he sought to file a writ application with this court on December 10, 2010, “The Clerk of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal” informed him that, the matter was appealable and could not be reviewed via writ application.
State v. Hunter 62 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
the defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence.
State of Louisiana v. Gene Paul Dowden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Harris 63 So. 3d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nonetheless, the defendant entered a plea of guilty as charged, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s
State of Louisiana v. Heath M. Wiggins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Odoms 62 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
He pled nolo contendere as charged, to appeal the denial of his subsequently filed written motion to quash the bill of information.
State v. Williams 62 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Thompson 58 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Landry 60 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Ms. Landry pled guilty to the amended bill, preserving her right to appeal the court’s
State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McKenzie 61 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Reed 61 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Foster, 263 La.
State v. Caccioppo 61 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
following the denial of her motion to suppress evidence.
State v. Crochet 61 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
As counsel notes in her brief
State of Louisiana v. Hung Nguyen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/4/09), (footnote omitted)
State v. Nguyen 55 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/4/09), (footnote omitted)
State v. Birgans 57 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Defendant rejected that offer and countered with his own that he would serve five years and reserve the right to appeal a but the state rejected that proposal.
State v. Ramsey 60 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
On December 18, 2009, Mr. Ramséy whereby he reserved his “right to appeal the Court’s rulings on his pretrial motions.” He signed the Boykin form and was advised, during the colloquy with the trial judge, of his right to a jury trial, the right of confrontation, and the privilege against self-incrimination.
State v. Williams 60 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Blank 61 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Spells 56 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
After the trial court’s evidentiary ruling, Mr. Spells entered a thereby reserving his right to challenge on appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence.
State v. Wilson 56 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The defendant later withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute heroin, 2 reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Suppress the evidence ^