Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
State v. Wright 850 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Joseph 847 So. 2d 1196 La. 2003
A defendant's failure to specify which pre-trial rulings he desires to reserve for appeal as part of a may limit the scope of appellate review but should not preclude review altogether.
State v. Barnard 847 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Watson 847 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Isidore 845 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
he reserved his right to appeal the judge's denial of his motion to quash.
State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)
State v. Landry 845 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Glosson 843 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
I RCrosby Plea After the trial court denied Glos-son’s motion in limine to exclude other crimes evidence
State v. Hebert 846 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
challenging the validity of the basis for the search of his home that disclosed the narcotics.
State v. Vu 846 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
On November 6, 2001, the date set for trial, the defendant entered a plea of guilty as charged to DWI, fourth offense
State v. Comena 843 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The defendant waived a and North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Bradley 844 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
40:967(C) after he entered a
State v. Brooks 838 So. 2d 778 La. 2003
State v. Eppinette 838 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
14:98, with an agreed upon sentence; however
State v. Guilbeau 838 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Further, reserving his right to review the motion to suppress on appeal.
State v. Hogan 839 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
On that day, the Defendant withdrew his prior not guilty pleas and pled guilty to both charges
State v. Joseph 839 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson 833 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
(preserves for appellate review alleged pre-plea errors).
State v. Mercante 836 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
On June 13, 2002 the court heard and denied the motion to suppress, whereupon the defendant advised the court that he wished to plead guilty to the charge
State v. Hebert 838 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Palmer 834 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Defendant then pled guilty to a charge of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, with an agreed 10-year sentence, to appeal the denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Meredith 833 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
14:98, reserving his right to appeal the denial of a
State v. Gassenberger 836 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
The Defendant next withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a guilty plea, (La.
State v. Duquestrada 833 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Jones 835 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The defendant later withdrew his not guilty plea and entered a (La.
State v. Lange 832 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
He entered a guilty plea under State v. *399 Crosby, and was sentenced pursuant to La.
State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hayes 836 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sullivan 827 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/8/99) , , writ denied, 00-0053 (La.6/23/00)
State v. Ables 829 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
thereby reserving her right to appeal the ruling on the motion to quash the bill of information.
State v. Cox 829 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Breland 835 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Thereafter, the defendant entered a
State v. Handy 828 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
On that date, the defendant withdrew his prior plea of not guilty and pled guilty as charged, to appeal the trial court's ruling on the motion to suppress the evidence.
State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sims 823 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Fairley 822 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[1] Defendant initially pled not guilty, but after the trial court denied his Motions to Suppress Evidence and to Quash the Bill of Information, defendant withdrew the pleas of not guilty and pled guilty as charged
State v. Fairley 822 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[1] Defendant initially pled not guilty, but after the trial court denied his Motions to Suppress Evidence and to Quash the Bill of Information, defendant withdrew the pleas of not guilty and pled guilty as charged
State v. Mayeux 820 So. 2d 526 La. 2002
On September 27, 2001, the defendant pled guilty, waived all delays for re-sentencing
State v. Hughes 821 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
NOTES [1] thereby reserving his right to appeal the ruling on the motion to suppress.
State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Fleming 820 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Fleming 820 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Gaspard 820 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)
State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Hill 821 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of his Motion to Suppress Evidence.
State v. Kerwin 821 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
The Defendant subsequently withdrew his not guilty plea and entered a reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Cotton 818 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. McCoy 817 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 818 La. 2002
The decision of the court of appeal is therefore reversed, the ruling of the trial court on the motion to suppress is reinstated, as are respondent's convictions and sentences by way of guilty pleas premised on review of the suppression issue, and this case is remanded to the district court for execution of sentence.