Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Fort 670 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The defendant then entered a to appeal the court’s ruling on the motion to suppress the physical evidence.
State v. Dillon 670 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Miskel 668 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
The defendant then withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a
State v. Gray 668 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
At that time defendant appeared with counsel, withdrew his former plea of guilty and entered a
State v. Braquet 694 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Charles 666 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
he reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
State v. Senegal 664 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Lane 665 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Smith 664 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Subsequently, defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a preserving his right to appeal the denial of his Motion to Suppress.
State v. Dorsey 662 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Following the trial court's denial of his motions to suppress evidence and confession, the defendant entered into a
State v. Highfill 671 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Rolen 662 So. 2d 446 La. 1995
State v. Miller 663 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Defendant thereafter reached a plea agreement with the State, withdrew his former plea, and entered a
State v. Castaneda 658 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
When Castaneda entered his plea, to appeal the court's denial of the motion to suppress, and he specifically waived any pre-plea "vices and defects."
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
After being apprised of his rights, he pled guilty as charged to that offense on January 3, 1994
State v. Owens 655 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Alfred 657 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated "[a]n Unqualified plea of guilty does not preclude review of what are regarded as `jurisdictional' defectsthose which, even conceding the accused's factual guilt, do not permit his conviction of the offense charged."
State v. Hall 652 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Marse 651 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Guffey 649 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
and its progeny, when a plea of guilty is entered, the defendant waives all non-jurisdictional defects.
State v. Smith 649 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
NOTES [1] As to the first count, (La.
State v. Brown 647 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Craft 648 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Hamilton 648 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
He reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress confession
State v. Rice 648 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
and its progeny, which allow defendants to enter qualified guilty pleas while reserving the right to appellate review of pre-plea errors.
State v. Louis 645 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
*1146 Defendant then entered a guilty plea, to appeal the denial of his motion.
State v. Parker 645 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Alston 643 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
The defendant then entered a plea of guilty, as charged, reserving the right to raise the denial of the motion to suppress on appeal.
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
The defendant then entered a plea of guilty, as charged, reserving the right to raise the denial of the motion to suppress on appeal.
State v. Range 642 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Jones 641 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Stone 641 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
and reserved his right to appeal pre-trial errors.
State v. Bailey 639 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Mingo 638 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
to appeal the trial court's ruling on the motion to suppress.
State v. Isaac 639 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
On August 31, 1993, the defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence.
State v. Thomas 638 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Defendant then withdrew his earlier not guilty plea and tendered a plea of guilty as charged, to appeal the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion.
State v. Smith 638 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
thereby reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress confession.
State v. Campbell 640 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Defendant then entered a reserving his right to appeal.
State v. Collins 637 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
40:967 C. Originally, reserving his right to seek review on appeal of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
State v. Billings 640 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
After its denial, the defendant entered a reserving his right to *501 review the denial of his motion to introduce prior sexual activity.
State v. Guidry 635 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Daniels 634 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Whitley 634 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Louis 634 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
At the time of the plea, defendant reserved his right, to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash the indictment.
State v. Solomon 634 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Hartzheim 633 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
NOTES [1] thereby reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
State v. Skipper 632 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994